7.9 sec in total
195 ms
7.1 sec
655 ms
Visit ocula.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Ocula content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ocula.co.uk
Motion Graphics & Visual FX studio based in Bristol. From Corporate Animation. Virtual Tours through to Experimental Motion Graphics. Learn more.
Visit ocula.co.ukWe analyzed Ocula.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 195 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ocula.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value25.5 s
0/100
25%
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value3,770 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.102
89/100
15%
Value21.2 s
1/100
10%
195 ms
5302 ms
172 ms
213 ms
305 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Ocula.co.uk, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ocula.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 450.9 kB (10%)
4.5 MB
4.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Ocula.co.uk main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 397.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ocula images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ocula.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (56%)
68
30
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ocula. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ocula.co.uk
195 ms
www.ocula.co.uk
5302 ms
gtm.js
172 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
213 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
305 ms
sb-instagram-2-2.min.css
308 ms
style.min.css
362 ms
styles.css
306 ms
css
207 ms
bootstrap.min.css
334 ms
style.css
365 ms
style-responsive.css
399 ms
animate.min.css
421 ms
vertical-rhythm.min.css
416 ms
owl.carousel.css
397 ms
magnific-popup.css
424 ms
font-awesome.min.css
429 ms
et-line.css
426 ms
style.css
428 ms
js_composer.min.css
497 ms
jquery.js
437 ms
jquery.form.min.js
425 ms
scripts.js
425 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
429 ms
bootstrap.min.js
429 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
428 ms
jquery.localScroll.min.js
428 ms
jquery.viewport.mini.js
474 ms
jquery.sticky.js
481 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
483 ms
wow.min.js
486 ms
all.js
701 ms
wp-embed.min.js
702 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
702 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
702 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
704 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
702 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
704 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
705 ms
analytics.js
46 ms
collect
146 ms
logo_white_green2.png
114 ms
logo_green_white.png
112 ms
ocula_ident_space_image-650x418.png
591 ms
Sabey_Thumb_nail_-650x418.jpg
113 ms
showreel_image-650x418.png
329 ms
sabey_2.jpg
328 ms
CDA-005-Render_small.jpg
558 ms
Illustration.jpg
435 ms
MixRadio1170.jpg
399 ms
logos__0015_Layer-0.jpg
399 ms
logos__0012_Layer-5.jpg
398 ms
logos__0001_Layer-17.jpg
472 ms
logos__0003_Layer-14.jpg
471 ms
logos__0010_Layer-7.jpg
470 ms
logos__0002_Layer-15.jpg
495 ms
logos__0007_Layer-10.jpg
526 ms
logos__0008_Layer-9.jpg
526 ms
logos__0013_Layer-4.jpg
529 ms
logos__0011_Layer-6.jpg
559 ms
logos__0009_oakwood-logo-1392134150.jpg
610 ms
logos__0004_Layer-13.jpg
593 ms
logos__0005_Layer-12.jpg
609 ms
logos__0006_Layer-11.jpg
619 ms
logos__0000_Layer-20.jpg
625 ms
logos__0014_Layer-2.jpg
635 ms
logo_green_white-1.png
652 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
576 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
244 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
288 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
305 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMB.ttf
304 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf
302 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf
302 ms
player_api
140 ms
ocula_ident_space_image.png
632 ms
www-widgetapi.js
9 ms
kpPq4PQh_j0
35 ms
ocula.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ocula.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ocula.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ocula.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ocula.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ocula.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ocula. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: