20.5 sec in total
8.8 sec
11.2 sec
388 ms
Click here to check amazing Oemand content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about oemand.dk
Vi er specialister i at lave online løsninger. Vi tilbyder blandt andet hjemmesider, udvikling, markedsføring og søgemaskineoptimering.
Visit oemand.dkWe analyzed Oemand.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 8.8 sec and then it took 11.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
oemand.dk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value15.2 s
1/100
10%
Value20,470 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.541
14/100
15%
Value30.9 s
0/100
10%
8846 ms
201 ms
200 ms
58 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Oemand.dk, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Oemand.dk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (66%)
1.9 MB
633.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Oemand.dk main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oemand images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 828.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 828.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 349.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oemand.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 349.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (62%)
65
25
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oemand. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
oemand.dk
8846 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
201 ms
js_composer_front.css
200 ms
css
58 ms
css
68 ms
css
80 ms
css
89 ms
styles.css
194 ms
rgs.css
205 ms
font-awesome.min.css
206 ms
steadysets.css
207 ms
linecon.css
287 ms
style.css
286 ms
responsive.css
368 ms
jquery.js
483 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
286 ms
modernizr.js
294 ms
core.min.js
362 ms
widget.min.js
361 ms
position.min.js
374 ms
menu.min.js
439 ms
autocomplete.min.js
445 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
447 ms
jquery.form.min.js
448 ms
scripts.js
470 ms
superfish.js
525 ms
respond.js
532 ms
nicescroll.js
621 ms
sticky.js
535 ms
prettyPhoto.js
561 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
566 ms
isotope.min.js
613 ms
carouFredSel.min.js
708 ms
appear.js
623 ms
init.js
848 ms
nectar-slider.js
852 ms
comment-reply.min.js
699 ms
nectar-love.js
706 ms
js_composer_front.js
710 ms
wp-embed.min.js
786 ms
parallax.js
627 ms
style.css
708 ms
logo1.png
578 ms
oemand.dk
578 ms
loading-white-bg.gif
578 ms
frederiksbergmuseerne-small.jpg
577 ms
excelexperten-small.jpg
576 ms
cisternerne-small.jpg
577 ms
taekkemand-bang-small.jpg
701 ms
mansted-small.jpg
739 ms
diagonal_line.png
700 ms
nectar-loading.gif
698 ms
ny_hjemmeside_lille.png
943 ms
webshop.jpg
830 ms
frederiksbergmuseerne-100x100.jpg
807 ms
silverrudder-100x100.jpg
808 ms
quadrugby-100x100.jpg
807 ms
noiselezz-100x100.jpg
831 ms
excelexperten-100x100.jpg
831 ms
baadnyl-100x100.jpg
836 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
588 ms
DsLzC9scoPnrGiwYYMQXpkpeNX8RPf6i6WQfJWyCWEs.ttf
588 ms
M__Wu4PAmHf4YZvQM8tWsDnFfol0SnfBMmbnmUK0fZM.ttf
589 ms
icomoon.woff
800 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1041 ms
analytics.js
506 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
844 ms
ny_hjemmeside.png
442 ms
responsive-design.jpg
574 ms
collect
72 ms
collect
94 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
176 ms
oemand.dk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
oemand.dk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
oemand.dk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DA
DA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oemand.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Danish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oemand.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oemand.dk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Oemand. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: