2.3 sec in total
218 ms
1.1 sec
950 ms
Visit online4.love now to see the best up-to-date Online 4 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about online4.love
Discovering the correct dating site/app increases your odds of meeting someone online by 73% based on a 2021 survey.
Visit online4.loveWe analyzed Online4.love page load time and found that the first response time was 218 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
online4.love performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
83/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value6,880 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value20.1 s
2/100
10%
218 ms
193 ms
47 ms
38 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Online4.love, 56% (22 requests) were made to Onlineforlove.com and 21% (8 requests) were made to Cdn.outgrow.us. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (657 ms) relates to the external source Onlineforlove.com.
Page size can be reduced by 340.4 kB (24%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Online4.love main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 711.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 284.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 284.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Online 4 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 55.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (32%)
37
25
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Online 4. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
online4.love
218 ms
onlineforlove.com
193 ms
Purple_4x-100px.png
47 ms
628cb35ac8007f50a722cb6c
38 ms
lazyload.min.js
14 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
128 ms
cropped-White_4x-1-1-100x68-1.webp
17 ms
1f9ea.svg
97 ms
onlineforlove-home2.png
71 ms
Cosmopolitan-Logo1.png
72 ms
Healthline-logo1.png
66 ms
Vice-logo1.png
556 ms
AskMen-logo1.png
556 ms
Mens-Health-logo1.png
71 ms
home_leftimg1.png
646 ms
Chart.png
94 ms
Tick.png
644 ms
Group-58.png
646 ms
art-1.png
107 ms
1148-Why-Is-EHarmony-So-Expensive-1024x576.png
115 ms
1146-eHarmony-for-Seniors-1024x576.png
245 ms
1145-EHarmony-Statistics-1024x576.png
644 ms
493-The-Only-Ashley-Madison-Review-1024x576.png
644 ms
97-Married-but-looking-1024x619.png
643 ms
23-Match-vs-eHarmony-1024x619.png
657 ms
jquery.min.js
118 ms
handsontable.full.min.css
97 ms
bootstrap.min.js
100 ms
moment.min.js
110 ms
filestack.js
107 ms
runtime-es2015.24869db8e440317a2349.js
102 ms
runtime-es5.24869db8e440317a2349.js
102 ms
polyfills-es5.94f4b09cb5ecdcb17186.js
167 ms
polyfills-es2015.777b39586274a08d5f72.js
99 ms
main-es2015.bba4cede0e3e2c29c750.js
548 ms
main-es5.bba4cede0e3e2c29c750.js
242 ms
65cWdRURGyuAMNnIltNw_og_logo.png
512 ms
analytics.js
512 ms
cp-popup.min.css
10 ms
online4.love accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
online4.love best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
online4.love SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Online4.love can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Online4.love main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
online4.love
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Online 4. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: