5.1 sec in total
1.3 sec
3.3 sec
577 ms
Click here to check amazing Online Broker Vergleich content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about onlinebrokervergleich.org
Ordergebühren, kostenlose Depotführung oder möglichst viele Handelsplätze. Welche Kriterien sind ausschlaggebend? Wir klären dich auf!
Visit onlinebrokervergleich.orgWe analyzed Onlinebrokervergleich.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
onlinebrokervergleich.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value1,180 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.119
84/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
1259 ms
109 ms
220 ms
353 ms
361 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Onlinebrokervergleich.org, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Onlinebrokervergleich.org.
Page size can be reduced by 751.4 kB (67%)
1.1 MB
366.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Onlinebrokervergleich.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 488.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Online Broker Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 305.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 305.4 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 398.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onlinebrokervergleich.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 398.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (37%)
38
24
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Online Broker Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.onlinebrokervergleich.org
1259 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
109 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
220 ms
bootstrap.min.css
353 ms
theme.min.css
361 ms
style.css
237 ms
jquery.js
360 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
242 ms
css
27 ms
stack-5687.css
336 ms
fa_style_widget.css
345 ms
conversion.js
18 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
469 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
469 ms
theme.min.js
783 ms
boxover.js
469 ms
logo_obv.jpg
126 ms
haken_gruen_trans.gif
125 ms
garantieversprechen.jpg
146 ms
1x1pixel.gif
160 ms
sprite1.png
164 ms
obv-testsiegel-consorsbank-94x90.png
237 ms
obv-testsiegel-onvista-festpreis-94x90.png
233 ms
comdirect.gif
256 ms
obv-testsiegel-comdirect-160x154.png
276 ms
consorsbank.gif
276 ms
siegertreppchen.png
343 ms
kommentar-screen.jpg
345 ms
i-hinweis
367 ms
bullen-und-baeren.jpg
536 ms
geschenkt.jpg
534 ms
prozentsieger.jpg
538 ms
leserbewertung.jpg
538 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
12 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
634 ms
67 ms
41 ms
analytics.js
71 ms
dropdownpfeil_unten_gray.png
111 ms
17 ms
collect
15 ms
16 ms
onlinebrokervergleich.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
onlinebrokervergleich.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
onlinebrokervergleich.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onlinebrokervergleich.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onlinebrokervergleich.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
onlinebrokervergleich.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Online Broker Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: