1.8 sec in total
387 ms
1.2 sec
166 ms
Welcome to opinahq.com homepage info - get ready to check Opinahq best content right away, or after learning these important things about opinahq.com
Design and publish online surveys in few minutes. It's free.
Visit opinahq.comWe analyzed Opinahq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 387 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
opinahq.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
89/100
10%
Value1.8 s
98/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.197
62/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
387 ms
593 ms
201 ms
293 ms
210 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Opinahq.com, 21% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (5 requests) were made to Assets.zendesk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (725 ms) belongs to the original domain Opinahq.com.
Page size can be reduced by 60.2 kB (14%)
437.7 kB
377.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Opinahq.com main page is 437.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 363.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Opinahq needs image optimization as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Opinahq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (39%)
36
22
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Opinahq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
opinahq.com
387 ms
bootstrap.min.css
593 ms
suti-commons.css
201 ms
suti-2nd-level.css
293 ms
suti-home.css
210 ms
css
55 ms
header-logo2.png
316 ms
questions-groups-textblocks.png
423 ms
validations.png
303 ms
invitations.png
420 ms
urlfriendly.png
488 ms
highrise.png
559 ms
zyncro.png
405 ms
ibmspss.png
557 ms
csv.png
725 ms
monitoring.png
558 ms
jquery.min.js
15 ms
bootstrap.min.js
680 ms
suti-main.js
595 ms
zenbox.js
60 ms
email-circle.png
606 ms
twitter-circle.png
631 ms
linkedin-circle.png
637 ms
people.png
284 ms
ondemand-bg.png
287 ms
download-bg.png
226 ms
arrow-pricing.png
234 ms
icon-types.png
266 ms
icon-data.png
315 ms
icon-3rdparty.png
329 ms
icon-reporting.png
338 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
35 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
35 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
35 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
34 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
33 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
36 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
35 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxlDMrAYtoOisqqMDW9M_Mqc.ttf
36 ms
ga.js
5 ms
zenbox.css
29 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
close_big.png
28 ms
loading.html
56 ms
load_large.gif
28 ms
opinahq.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
opinahq.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
opinahq.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
JA
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Opinahq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Opinahq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
opinahq.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Opinahq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: