839 ms in total
56 ms
690 ms
93 ms
Visit optamor.com now to see the best up-to-date Optamor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about optamor.com
Optamor challenges traditional recruitment and training solutions. We create and implement people-led, performance-focused talent solutions with our clients. Together, we attract, engage, evaluate and...
Visit optamor.comWe analyzed Optamor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 783 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
optamor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value1,680 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value17.1 s
4/100
10%
56 ms
36 ms
36 ms
29 ms
166 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Optamor.com, 34% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (404 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 621.0 kB (57%)
1.1 MB
471.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Optamor.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 598.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 482.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 482.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Optamor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 125.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.9 kB or 36% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (38%)
26
16
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Optamor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.optamor.com
56 ms
minified.js
36 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
36 ms
polyfill.min.js
29 ms
thunderbolt-commons.354484c3.bundle.min.js
166 ms
main.72e1f7cd.bundle.min.js
163 ms
lodash.min.js
161 ms
react.production.min.js
162 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
166 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
158 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
172 ms
Optamor%20Logo%20FINAL_No%20Strap%20(%20White%20).png
291 ms
bundle.min.js
81 ms
f8b84c_962979ace131460ba4dc2221cf2c9582~mv2.png
335 ms
f8b84c_a3a356747fca4cf38d488e0b5e1f59a6~mv2.jpg
196 ms
21276e9bb2a04809a76f2a7bfe161219.jpg
50 ms
11062b_943b58c87b634b808d4e21c87d169803~mv2.jpg
54 ms
f8b84c_594ba0b29e6f46b094e206784312837d~mv2.jpg
187 ms
f8b84c_594ba0b29e6f46b094e206784312837d~mv2.jpg
219 ms
f8b84c_522955d0dabf4d9bbccc24dba863e004~mv2.jpg
249 ms
f8b84c_522955d0dabf4d9bbccc24dba863e004~mv2.jpg
273 ms
f8b84c_0c9d8783c22f4db192986777bcc5f91e~mv2.jpg
390 ms
f8b84c_0c9d8783c22f4db192986777bcc5f91e~mv2.jpg
404 ms
114 ms
119 ms
108 ms
106 ms
107 ms
101 ms
157 ms
155 ms
152 ms
153 ms
148 ms
162 ms
PyqsDANUgLi2UsdO-d4iZQ.woff
10 ms
GwZ_PiN1Aind9Eyjp868Ez8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
18 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
26 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
11 ms
right-arrow.svg
11 ms
optamor.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
optamor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
optamor.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Optamor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Optamor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
optamor.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Optamor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: