2.1 sec in total
120 ms
1.7 sec
264 ms
Welcome to packagingalternatives.com homepage info - get ready to check Packaging Alternatives best content right away, or after learning these important things about packagingalternatives.com
Since 1994, Packaging Alternatives Corporation has serviced the packaging needs of businesses of all sizes in North and Central Florida. From our humble beginnings to our modern 42,000 square foot fac...
Visit packagingalternatives.comWe analyzed Packagingalternatives.com page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
packagingalternatives.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value2,610 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.133
81/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
120 ms
37 ms
47 ms
836 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Packagingalternatives.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to Images.jmcatalog.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to D2i2wahzwrm1n5.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (836 ms) belongs to the original domain Packagingalternatives.com.
Page size can be reduced by 434.7 kB (33%)
1.3 MB
882.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Packagingalternatives.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 551.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 170.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 75.6 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 918 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Packaging Alternatives images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 186.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.3 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packagingalternatives.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.2 kB or 43% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (66%)
47
16
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packaging Alternatives. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
packagingalternatives.com
120 ms
catalog
37 ms
47 ms
default.aspx
836 ms
bootstrap.min.css
159 ms
jquery-ui.css
131 ms
jquery.min.js
211 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
252 ms
bootstrap.min.js
228 ms
bootbox.min.js
157 ms
font-awesome.min.css
247 ms
main.css
355 ms
navbar.css
316 ms
items.css
317 ms
overall_Custom.css
336 ms
navbar_top_Custom.css
316 ms
navbar_category_Custom.css
364 ms
st_Default.css
366 ms
CombinedBaseSkinClassic.css
206 ms
FormDecorator.Default.css
197 ms
Ajax.Default.css
206 ms
WebForms.js
193 ms
ScriptResource.axd
388 ms
ScriptResource.axd
342 ms
ShortCutManagerScripts.js
199 ms
Core.js
202 ms
MaterialRippleScripts.js
201 ms
RadFormDecorator.js
201 ms
Ajax.js
199 ms
jQueryExternal.js
197 ms
OverlayScript.js
211 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
25 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
43 ms
item_sections.css
170 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
107 ms
css2
88 ms
css
22 ms
PACKPOLYSTRAPH.JPG
489 ms
DELSCL502R.JPG
494 ms
INTHS.JPG
459 ms
INTEH.JPG
458 ms
ELKAY113.JPG
492 ms
MIDINDMIP-100.JPG
457 ms
PACK30.JPG
495 ms
STOROBUBBLEPLUS.JPG
497 ms
STORO2.JPG
497 ms
header-logo.png
109 ms
header-logo-small.png
108 ms
2
433 ms
4377421.gif
108 ms
WwkQxPq1DFK04uqieVo.ttf
56 ms
bodybg.jpg
197 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
31 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
71 ms
ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-59U.ttf
10 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-33mZKCM.ttf
21 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meKCM.ttf
22 ms
packagingalternatives.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
packagingalternatives.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
packagingalternatives.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packagingalternatives.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Packagingalternatives.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
packagingalternatives.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packaging Alternatives. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: