2.2 sec in total
203 ms
1.5 sec
538 ms
Visit performancep.com now to see the best up-to-date Performancep content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about performancep.com
Why should you have to worry about cleaning when you have a school, business, or industrial plant to run? That’s where Performance Plus comes in.
Visit performancep.comWe analyzed Performancep.com page load time and found that the first response time was 203 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
performancep.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value13.0 s
0/100
25%
Value5.2 s
61/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.051
99/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
203 ms
68 ms
75 ms
79 ms
99 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Performancep.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (720 ms) belongs to the original domain Performancep.com.
Page size can be reduced by 96.3 kB (7%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Performancep.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Performancep images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Performancep.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (59%)
58
24
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Performancep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.performancep.com
203 ms
main.min.css
68 ms
video-js.min.css
75 ms
slick.css
79 ms
performancep-styles.min.css
99 ms
theme-overrides.min.css
69 ms
photoswipe.min.css
88 ms
module_99547740268_Header_stack_notification.min.css
78 ms
module_99154708358_menu.min.css
92 ms
module_99864442018_Header_Information.min.css
120 ms
module_100147018920_Banner_Fading_Carousel.css
128 ms
module_99153921128_card.min.css
123 ms
module_100584714612_Section_with_Parallax_Background.min.css
145 ms
module_100667767048_Video.min.css
128 ms
module_100055925086_Partners.min.css
144 ms
module_100055925840_Footer_Information.min.css
168 ms
css2
90 ms
videojs-resolution-switcher.min.css
94 ms
mapbox-gl.css
78 ms
33fd2456-ee67-4878-b254-087d481809c8.png
203 ms
current.js
157 ms
v2.js
111 ms
jquery-1.7.1.js
162 ms
embed.js
92 ms
f8b389c633.js
130 ms
slick.min.js
74 ms
video.min.js
203 ms
videojs-resolution-switcher.min.js
80 ms
mapbox-gl.min.js
319 ms
main.min.js
248 ms
project.js
248 ms
module_99154708358_menu.min.js
315 ms
module_100667767048_Video.min.js
316 ms
23572709.js
320 ms
index.js
317 ms
logo-293w.jpg
468 ms
KV-3-1920w.jpg
126 ms
2.jpg
159 ms
3.jpg
270 ms
GettyImages-1216383997-1920w.jpg
127 ms
cleaning+cart+2-1920w.jpg
129 ms
GettyImages-112156570_edited-1920w.jpg
130 ms
1-1920w.jpg
131 ms
car.jpg
159 ms
bg-home-1920w.jpg
160 ms
unmute.png
160 ms
bsc-psd2-1920w.jpg
406 ms
thumbnail_image002-1920w.jpg
416 ms
acbde-psd-4df7215f-1920w.jpg
428 ms
2022-GBAC-STAR-Facility-CMYK-1-Color_page-0001-mods4-8d4cb110-1920w.jpg
384 ms
nwiwa-psd2-1920w.png
720 ms
badge_180x55-1920w.jpg
508 ms
visa.png
599 ms
mastercard.png
655 ms
discover.png
641 ms
amex.png
648 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
40 ms
regular.woff
424 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
57 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
85 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
83 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf
84 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBhc9.ttf
86 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBBc9.ttf
85 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ABc9.ttf
65 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu52xP.ttf
84 ms
Yq6R-LCAWCX3-6Ky7FAFnOY.ttf
87 ms
regular.woff
664 ms
banner.js
118 ms
collectedforms.js
79 ms
23572709.js
115 ms
performancep.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
performancep.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
performancep.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Performancep.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Performancep.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
performancep.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Performancep. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: