Tools & Wizards About Us
photofiltre.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

photofiltre.com

PhotoFiltre Studio

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

518 ms

photofiltre.com screenshot

About Website

Visit photofiltre.com now to see the best up-to-date Photo Filtre content for Morocco and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about photofiltre.com

PhotoFiltre Studio

Visit photofiltre.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Photofiltre.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

photofiltre.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

photofiltre.com

1147 ms

www.photofiltre.com

308 ms

www.photofiltre-studio.com

656 ms

gris.png

169 ms

table2.png

193 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Photofiltre.com, 78% (7 requests) were made to Photofiltre-studio.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Photofiltre.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 kB (6%)

Content Size

31.4 kB

After Optimization

29.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Photofiltre.com main page is 31.4 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 30.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 473 B

  • Original 797 B
  • After minification 633 B
  • After compression 324 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 164 B, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 473 B or 59% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 30.6 kB
  • After minification 29.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Photo Filtre images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photo Filtre. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

photofiltre.com

photofiltre.com

1147 ms

www.photofiltre.com

www.photofiltre.com

308 ms

www.photofiltre-studio.com

www.photofiltre-studio.com

656 ms

gris.png

gris.png

169 ms

table2.png

table2.png

193 ms

film1.gif

film1.gif

191 ms

film3.gif

film3.gif

191 ms

demo.jpg

demo.jpg

363 ms

pixel_noir.gif

pixel_noir.gif

197 ms

Best Practices

photofiltre.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

photofiltre.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photofiltre.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Photofiltre.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

photofiltre.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Photo Filtre. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: