7.7 sec in total
715 ms
6.4 sec
613 ms
Visit planorama.com now to see the best up-to-date Planorama content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about planorama.com
With Planorama's leading image recognition solutions for retail, digitalize store checks, convert shelf pictures into planograms, and optimize shelf space.
Visit planorama.comWe analyzed Planorama.com page load time and found that the first response time was 715 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
planorama.com performance score
715 ms
1252 ms
32 ms
311 ms
157 ms
Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Planorama.com, 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Planorama.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (53%)
3.2 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Planorama.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 142.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Planorama images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 936.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 936.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 585.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Planorama.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 585.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (47%)
115
61
The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Planorama. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
planorama.com
715 ms
www.planorama.com
1252 ms
font-awesome.min.css
32 ms
dashicons.min.css
311 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
157 ms
thickbox.css
168 ms
styles.css
179 ms
settings.css
252 ms
wpsm.css
220 ms
frontend.css
229 ms
easy-twitter-feed-widget.css
232 ms
main.css
642 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
253 ms
responsive.css
241 ms
style.css
248 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.js
416 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
308 ms
css
37 ms
jquery.themepunch.enablelog.js
314 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
473 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
401 ms
core.min.js
314 ms
widget.min.js
319 ms
mouse.min.js
390 ms
resizable.min.js
399 ms
draggable.min.js
408 ms
button.min.js
417 ms
position.min.js
467 ms
dialog.min.js
475 ms
wpdialog.min.js
476 ms
thickbox.js
487 ms
jquery.form.min.js
496 ms
scripts.js
544 ms
wp-site-mapping.js
551 ms
js_composer_front-min.js
554 ms
widget-easy-twitter-feed-widget.js
564 ms
main-min.js
654 ms
other-min.js
811 ms
js
49 ms
accordion.min.js
620 ms
tabs.min.js
625 ms
lgs_jquery.cycle2.js
619 ms
wp-embed.min.js
627 ms
style.css
531 ms
analytics.js
86 ms
logo.png
102 ms
dummy.png
107 ms
home-column-clock.png
104 ms
home-column-target.png
104 ms
home-column-charts.png
105 ms
Map-planorama-2016-01.png
1250 ms
transparent.png
205 ms
yoplait.png
206 ms
ricard.png
207 ms
p_and_g.png
209 ms
lactalis.png
208 ms
Haribo.png
298 ms
bat.png
297 ms
reckitt-benckiser.png
1225 ms
nestle.png
298 ms
unilever.png
296 ms
imperial-tobacco.png
362 ms
fleury-michon.png
362 ms
pernod.png
358 ms
loreal.png
359 ms
heineken.png
1222 ms
general-mills.png
1222 ms
bayer.png
1222 ms
colgate.png
1222 ms
danone.png
1345 ms
glaxo.png
1345 ms
bel.png
1343 ms
granini.png
1344 ms
beiersdof.png
1343 ms
746px-Coca-Cola_logo_svg1.png
1344 ms
Mexican-officials-block-Nestle-s-Pfizer-Nutrition-acquisition.png
1761 ms
logo_footer.png
1708 ms
homecare-1-480x480.jpg
1760 ms
case-studie2-480x480.jpg
1759 ms
vignette-soft-drinks-480x480.jpg
1705 ms
LKf8nhXsWg5ybwEGXk8UBQ.woff
32 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
34 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1724 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
27 ms
collect
27 ms
Slide4.jpg
1664 ms
U3s8nApHJ60
167 ms
collect
89 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
861 ms
www-embed-player.js
882 ms
base.js
986 ms
widgets.js
937 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
888 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
875 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
872 ms
revolution.extension.carousel.min.js
869 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
1142 ms
OsJ2DjdpjqFRVUSto6IffD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
236 ms
_xyN3apAT_yRRDeqB3sPRg.woff
238 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
8 ms
U3s8nApHJ60
197 ms
syndication
592 ms
344713329262084096
649 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
413 ms
ad_status.js
471 ms
loader.gif
143 ms
openhand.cur
144 ms
revicons.woff
240 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
193 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
193 ms
Slide1.jpg
336 ms
hand-iphone.png
737 ms
proxy.jpg
273 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.dark.ltr.css
141 ms
www.planorama.com
1007 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.dark.ltr.css
144 ms
proxy.jpg
231 ms
KWPrfvOE_normal.jpeg
202 ms
b-2vztxg_normal.png
202 ms
RjErt0X0_normal.jpeg
207 ms
CUpU9wAXAAEcNVd.jpg:small
203 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
73 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
69 ms
proxy.jpg
63 ms
proxy.jpg
11 ms
jot.html
4 ms
planorama.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Planorama.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Planorama.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
planorama.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Planorama. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: