5.7 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.7 sec
1.8 sec
Visit praxis.tech now to see the best up-to-date Praxis content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about praxis.tech
One superior platform to seamlessly orchestrate all your payments. Our payments technology is specifically designed to empower your business.
Visit praxis.techWe analyzed Praxis.tech page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
praxis.tech performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value41.6 s
0/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value23.7 s
1/100
10%
1222 ms
84 ms
126 ms
145 ms
426 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Praxis.tech, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Kit.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Praxis.tech.
Page size can be reduced by 511.9 kB (6%)
8.9 MB
8.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Praxis.tech main page is 8.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 390.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Praxis images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Praxis.tech needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (45%)
56
31
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Praxis. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
praxis.tech
1222 ms
28b3a3fab0.js
84 ms
main.min.css
126 ms
theme-overrides.min.css
145 ms
module_86581478123_navigation.min.css
426 ms
module_88626633191_hero_section.min.css
462 ms
module_86213003229_bento_cards.min.css
163 ms
module_84185968850_section_title.min.css
164 ms
module_82189733577_info_card.min.css
240 ms
module_82468394185_text_block.min.css
267 ms
module_82380186310_logos_list.min.css
281 ms
module_81515475432_button.min.css
287 ms
module_86181045743_footer_menu.min.css
368 ms
module_88435719140_footer_notice.min.css
389 ms
js
93 ms
embed.js
62 ms
main.min.js
401 ms
project.js
313 ms
index.min.js
441 ms
module_82189733577_info_card.min.js
532 ms
module_86181045743_footer_menu.min.js
538 ms
26829722.js
534 ms
index.js
428 ms
css2
30 ms
25.svg
67 ms
Logo-24-W.svg
70 ms
Cashier.png
68 ms
%5BImagery%5D%20%5BMenu%5D%20Direct-1.png
72 ms
%5BDropdown%5D%20%5BMenu%5D%20%5BProduct%5D%20Cashier.png
73 ms
yahoo.png
74 ms
finech.png
132 ms
ap.png
74 ms
gambling.png
134 ms
bullion.png
133 ms
coins-banner.png
558 ms
payment-1.svg
135 ms
regular.woff
457 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf
66 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf
99 ms
600.woff
745 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf
129 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf
129 ms
hero_image%20%287%29.png
105 ms
Increased%20Approvals-1.png
77 ms
praxis.tech
551 ms
support.png
115 ms
integration.png
140 ms
End%20user%20satisfaction-1.png
142 ms
bdcc.png
166 ms
delivered.png
167 ms
ratios.png
195 ms
analytics.png
201 ms
funds.png
232 ms
payments.png
239 ms
convenience.png
268 ms
Frame%20236222849.png
276 ms
Frame%2011565-1.png
329 ms
hosted.png
309 ms
Frame%2011566-2.png
358 ms
fb.js
426 ms
conversations-embed.js
454 ms
banner.js
530 ms
26829722.js
500 ms
praxis.tech accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
praxis.tech best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
praxis.tech SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Praxis.tech can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Praxis.tech main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
praxis.tech
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Praxis. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: