Tools & Wizards About Us
presse.preisvergleich.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

presse.preisvergleich.de

1. Platz Preisvergleichsportale | PREISVERGLEICH.de

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

302 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

196 ms

presse.preisvergleich.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Presse PREISVERGLEICH content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about presse.preisvergleich.de

Sparen Sie mit unseren Vergleichsrechnern für Strom, Gas, Internet, Mobilfunk, Versicherungen, Kredit & mehr – Ausgezeichnet vom DtGV 2023/2024 ➤ Die besten Preise finden Sie hier im unabhängigen Prei...

Visit presse.preisvergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Presse.preisvergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 302 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

presse.preisvergleich.de performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,510 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.9 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

presse.preisvergleich.de

302 ms

presse

602 ms

2678 ms

style.css

215 ms

base-kit.php

210 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Presse.preisvergleich.de, 84% (41 requests) were made to Preisvergleich.de and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Preisvergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 485.2 kB (47%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

538.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Presse.preisvergleich.de main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 428.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 62.2 kB

  • Original 74.1 kB
  • After minification 61.8 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.3 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 40.2 kB

  • Original 400.1 kB
  • After minification 359.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Presse PREISVERGLEICH images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 284.7 kB

  • Original 428.7 kB
  • After minification 402.8 kB
  • After compression 144.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 284.7 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 98.1 kB

  • Original 120.3 kB
  • After minification 109.4 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Presse.preisvergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 98.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (56%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Presse PREISVERGLEICH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

presse.preisvergleich.de

presse.preisvergleich.de

302 ms

presse

presse

602 ms

2678 ms

style.css

style.css

215 ms

base-kit.php

base-kit.php

210 ms

pvg-kit.php

pvg-kit.php

322 ms

style.css

style.css

211 ms

nextgen_gallery_related_images.css

nextgen_gallery_related_images.css

204 ms

styles.css

styles.css

387 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

412 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

623 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

415 ms

persist.js

persist.js

524 ms

store.js

store.js

527 ms

ngg_store.js

ngg_store.js

596 ms

lightbox_context.js

lightbox_context.js

616 ms

wp-page-numbers.css

wp-page-numbers.css

649 ms

social-buttons.min.css

social-buttons.min.css

738 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

645 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

719 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

743 ms

shariff.complete.js

shariff.complete.js

1058 ms

colorbox.js

colorbox.js

841 ms

base.js

base.js

845 ms

iam.js

iam.js

395 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

711 ms

logo.png

logo.png

39 ms

studie-eislaufen-in-deutschland-768x513-1-150x100.jpg

studie-eislaufen-in-deutschland-768x513-1-150x100.jpg

389 ms

Preisvergleich.de_Pressemitteilung-Star-Wars_72dpi-150x146.jpg

Preisvergleich.de_Pressemitteilung-Star-Wars_72dpi-150x146.jpg

601 ms

Preisvergleich.de_Parkkosten_Banner-150x77.jpg

Preisvergleich.de_Parkkosten_Banner-150x77.jpg

593 ms

Tabelle_EEG_Umlage_2016_Preisvergleich_de_72dpi-e1444906230632-150x97.jpg

Tabelle_EEG_Umlage_2016_Preisvergleich_de_72dpi-e1444906230632-150x97.jpg

500 ms

Presse-preisvergleich.de-Studie_Pro_Kopf_Stromverbrauch-Deutschlandkarte-112x150.png

Presse-preisvergleich.de-Studie_Pro_Kopf_Stromverbrauch-Deutschlandkarte-112x150.png

712 ms

Erste-Hilfe-im-Sport-Ratgeber-106x150.png

Erste-Hilfe-im-Sport-Ratgeber-106x150.png

704 ms

presse_preisvergleich.de_top10_ostergeschenke-typ2-117x150.png

presse_preisvergleich.de_top10_ostergeschenke-typ2-117x150.png

1012 ms

906689384.png

906689384.png

708 ms

754840550.png

754840550.png

1011 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

50 ms

pvg_branding_sprite_3.6.3.png

pvg_branding_sprite_3.6.3.png

1187 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

1293 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

4 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

border1.png

border1.png

577 ms

border2.png

border2.png

576 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

672 ms

sprite_no_repeat.png

sprite_no_repeat.png

914 ms

qs.ioam.de

qs.ioam.de

189 ms

tx.io

tx.io

195 ms

tx.io

tx.io

97 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

305 ms

Accessibility Review

presse.preisvergleich.de accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

presse.preisvergleich.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

presse.preisvergleich.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Presse.preisvergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Presse.preisvergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

presse.preisvergleich.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Presse PREISVERGLEICH. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: