Tools & Wizards About Us
projectexpedition.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

projectexpedition.com

Project Expedition - Book Tours, Activities & Things to Do

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

982 ms

Page Rendered

740 ms

projectexpedition.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Project Expedition content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about projectexpedition.com

Discover and book excursions, tours, and attractions in destinations around the world with Project Expedition. Thousands to choose from with great prices and exceptional service.

Visit projectexpedition.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Projectexpedition.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

projectexpedition.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,800 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.884

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

projectexpedition.com

37 ms

projectexpedition.com

42 ms

www.projectexpedition.com

230 ms

bootstrap.min.js

11 ms

xUtils.min.js

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Projectexpedition.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Client.crisp.chat and 4% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (294 ms) relates to the external source Client.crisp.chat.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 720.7 kB (38%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Projectexpedition.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 460.8 kB

  • Original 572.1 kB
  • After minification 524.7 kB
  • After compression 111.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 460.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 248.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 858.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Project Expedition needs image optimization as it can save up to 248.7 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 521 B

  • Original 76.1 kB
  • After minification 76.1 kB
  • After compression 75.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 161.7 kB
  • After minification 161.7 kB
  • After compression 151.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectexpedition.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (33%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Project Expedition. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

projectexpedition.com

projectexpedition.com

37 ms

projectexpedition.com

projectexpedition.com

42 ms

www.projectexpedition.com

www.projectexpedition.com

230 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

11 ms

xUtils.min.js

xUtils.min.js

31 ms

jquery.lazy.min.js

jquery.lazy.min.js

53 ms

jquery.datetimepicker.css

jquery.datetimepicker.css

59 ms

jquery.datetimepicker.js

jquery.datetimepicker.js

70 ms

client:platform.js

client:platform.js

101 ms

home.min.js

home.min.js

74 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

82 ms

socket.io-2.3.0.js

socket.io-2.3.0.js

119 ms

helpdesk.svg

helpdesk.svg

77 ms

share.svg

share.svg

83 ms

loading2.gif

loading2.gif

85 ms

video.jpg

video.jpg

95 ms

default-act-sight-widget.jpg

default-act-sight-widget.jpg

85 ms

signature.png

signature.png

94 ms

tln.png

tln.png

91 ms

mast.png

mast.png

125 ms

oa.png

oa.png

92 ms

khm.png

khm.png

93 ms

tzell.png

tzell.png

113 ms

nexion.png

nexion.png

113 ms

gtn.png

gtn.png

113 ms

ttand.png

ttand.png

111 ms

AvenirNext-Regular.woff

AvenirNext-Regular.woff

123 ms

AvenirNext-Medium.woff

AvenirNext-Medium.woff

124 ms

projectexpedition.woff

projectexpedition.woff

123 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

158 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

233 ms

l.js

l.js

294 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

130 ms

heart-empty.jpg

heart-empty.jpg

49 ms

dominican-republic-punta-cana.jpg

dominican-republic-punta-cana.jpg

48 ms

united-states-hawaii_square.jpg

united-states-hawaii_square.jpg

67 ms

thailand_krabi_square.jpg

thailand_krabi_square.jpg

68 ms

bahamas_square.jpg

bahamas_square.jpg

44 ms

costa-rica_square.jpg

costa-rica_square.jpg

47 ms

AvenirNext-DemiBold.woff

AvenirNext-DemiBold.woff

73 ms

collect

collect

74 ms

icons.data.svg.min.css

icons.data.svg.min.css

61 ms

collect

collect

178 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

109 ms

client.js

client.js

150 ms

client_default.css

client_default.css

84 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

135 ms

Accessibility Review

projectexpedition.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

projectexpedition.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

projectexpedition.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectexpedition.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Projectexpedition.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

projectexpedition.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Project Expedition. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: