2.1 sec in total
261 ms
1.3 sec
564 ms
Welcome to proofreading.org homepage info - get ready to check Proofreading best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about proofreading.org
Cambridge Proofreading provides subject-specialist proofreading and editing services. The best quality, fairest prices, and a 100% guarantee. Consistently the highest-rated online editing service on T...
Visit proofreading.orgWe analyzed Proofreading.org page load time and found that the first response time was 261 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
proofreading.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
92/100
10%
Value3.7 s
59/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value1,000 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.398
25/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
261 ms
103 ms
25 ms
7 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Proofreading.org, 6% (6 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Sd.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (448 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 520.4 kB (51%)
1.0 MB
499.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Proofreading.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 459.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Proofreading needs image optimization as it can save up to 49.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 310.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 310.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Proofreading.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (34%)
96
63
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Proofreading. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
proofreading.org
261 ms
style.1.1.min.css
103 ms
buttons.js
25 ms
loader.js
7 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
cufon-yui.js
120 ms
gen_validatorv4.js
124 ms
Rockwell_400-Rockwell_700-Rockwell_italic_400-Rockwell_italic_700.font.js
169 ms
js
42 ms
jquery.google_map.js
56 ms
jquery.custom.js
116 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
182 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
159 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
8 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
tp_elements_all.js
29 ms
logo.png
54 ms
email.jpg
57 ms
phone.jpg
55 ms
introBack.jpg
57 ms
underline.jpg
200 ms
pen2.jpg
207 ms
price.png
201 ms
sp1.jpg
207 ms
sp2.jpg
205 ms
sp3.jpg
206 ms
quickneasy.jpg
206 ms
orderNow.jpg
205 ms
pricing.jpg
252 ms
paypal.jpg
260 ms
contentTop.jpg
237 ms
info2.jpg
246 ms
proof-reading.jpg
268 ms
noname.jpg
253 ms
trustpilot1.png
300 ms
contentBottom.jpg
273 ms
tick.jpg
279 ms
table2psd.png
280 ms
quik.jpg
292 ms
steps.jpg
298 ms
testimonialImageBack.jpg
297 ms
klaus.jpg
312 ms
jonas.jpg
305 ms
abidin.jpg
324 ms
sampletestimonialimage.jpg
323 ms
quickneasy1.jpg
322 ms
quickorderback.jpg
326 ms
tick2.jpg
320 ms
fromtextboxback.jpg
336 ms
collect
153 ms
tp_widget_loader.gif
153 ms
Box
353 ms
getpricenorderbtn.jpg
302 ms
noteback.jpg
297 ms
counterlogo2.png
307 ms
counter.jpg
322 ms
footerlogo.png
310 ms
clients-banner-1.jpg
310 ms
all.js
329 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
195 ms
clients-banner-2.jpg
193 ms
footerTextBox.jpg
204 ms
footertextarea.jpg
204 ms
sendbtn.jpg
196 ms
unsupportedbrowser
64 ms
24x24.png
200 ms
sprite.png
8 ms
getSegment.php
29 ms
checkOAuth.esi
74 ms
t.dhj
50 ms
41 ms
xd_arbiter.php
215 ms
xd_arbiter.php
448 ms
t.dhj
44 ms
cm
32 ms
x35248
131 ms
s-3271.xgi
10 ms
hbpix
54 ms
9 ms
9 ms
xrefid.xgi
10 ms
image.sbxx
40 ms
nr-885.min.js
41 ms
abtest.d0be1bac1a23ac98ce053e1dd08cc781.html
14 ms
hoverbuttons_reskin.1581f73092bf0aeddc0bb88d0aaa31d0.css
6 ms
hoverbuttons_reskin.3bc05701d07578cfb4db9517abf2dbc2.js
10 ms
image.sbxx
26 ms
5596035ebd
63 ms
buttons.ab966a004186897711de4a5ed256c924.css
35 ms
hbclose.png
4 ms
ga.js
5 ms
hbRightArrow.png
3 ms
__utm.gif
6 ms
facebook_32.png
8 ms
twitter_32.png
15 ms
googleplus_32.png
20 ms
linkedin_32.png
29 ms
unsupportedbrowser
78 ms
proofreading.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
proofreading.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
proofreading.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Proofreading.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Proofreading.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
proofreading.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Proofreading. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: