5.8 sec in total
123 ms
4.3 sec
1.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Prov content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about prov.us
ProviNET Solutions is a full-service IT company that offers a comprehensive spectrum of technology products and services.
Visit prov.usWe analyzed Prov.us page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
prov.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value22.1 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value810 ms
36/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value26.8 s
0/100
10%
123 ms
1164 ms
123 ms
131 ms
201 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Prov.us, 74% (77 requests) were made to Provinet.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Provinet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 713.0 kB (9%)
7.8 MB
7.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Prov.us main page is 7.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 599.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Prov images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Prov.us has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (81%)
91
17
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Prov. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
prov.us
123 ms
www.provinet.com
1164 ms
adsbygoogle.js
123 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
131 ms
jquery-ui.css
201 ms
livechat-icons.css
206 ms
style.min.css
189 ms
theme.min.css
207 ms
blocks.style.build.css
235 ms
foogallery.min.css
334 ms
fusion-extension-blog.css
333 ms
fusion-extension-divider.css
321 ms
flexslider.css
331 ms
photoswipe.css
321 ms
default-skin.css
340 ms
video-js.min.css
338 ms
fusion-extension-gallery.css
331 ms
fusion-extension-image.css
362 ms
fusion-extension-map.css
362 ms
fusion-extension-menu.css
359 ms
fusion-extension-post-details.css
365 ms
fusion-extension-sidebar.css
364 ms
fusion-extension-video.css
362 ms
bootstrap.min.css
412 ms
fusion-bootstrap.css
430 ms
material-icons.css
409 ms
fusion-core.css
406 ms
video-js.min.css
433 ms
style.css
443 ms
style.css
453 ms
blocks.css
448 ms
all.css
381 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
450 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
453 ms
frontend.min.css
454 ms
post-4009.css
476 ms
frontend.min.css
511 ms
all.min.css
484 ms
v4-shims.min.css
479 ms
font-awesome.min.css
243 ms
css
198 ms
v4-shims.css
475 ms
css
313 ms
js
225 ms
widget.js
329 ms
animate.css
474 ms
show_ads_impl.js
125 ms
zrt_lookup.html
218 ms
featherlight.css
384 ms
featherlight-slider.css
1219 ms
jquery.min.js
361 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
357 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
362 ms
jquery.transit.js
327 ms
flash_detect.js
245 ms
svgs-inline-min.js
245 ms
v4-shims.min.js
236 ms
scripts.js
236 ms
inview.js
231 ms
featherlight.js
229 ms
slider.js
231 ms
featherlight-gallery.js
231 ms
countUp.js
216 ms
dtgsnonce.js
214 ms
mpp-frontend.js
216 ms
bootstrap.min.js
218 ms
modernizr-3.3.1-respond-1.4.2.min.js
222 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
239 ms
fusion-core.js
196 ms
video.min.js
269 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
178 ms
navigation.js
176 ms
global.js
196 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
188 ms
wp-embed.min.js
193 ms
lftracker_v1_ywVkO4XDRp14Z6Bj.js
167 ms
logo-new.png
162 ms
Chicago-scaled.jpg
1382 ms
pexels-lukas-684314-scaled.jpg
153 ms
Careers-Header-for-Website-Slider.png
151 ms
White-Paper-Cover-Page.png
1503 ms
pexels-keira-burton-6084284-scaled.jpg
148 ms
computer-desk-laptop-stethoscope-48604-scaled.jpg
147 ms
shutterstock_175317803-e1409105377868-scaled.jpg
149 ms
pexels-sora-shimazaki-5668858-scaled.jpg
298 ms
transparent.png
291 ms
mimi-thian-737030-unsplash.jpg
295 ms
rawpixel-1067085-unsplash.jpg
376 ms
analytics.js
968 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
737 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
1187 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
1237 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff
1236 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
182 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
967 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1187 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
111 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
184 ms
cookie.js
1166 ms
integrator.js
1147 ms
ads
670 ms
tr.lfeeder.com
1016 ms
tracking.js
557 ms
collect
143 ms
prov.us accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
prov.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
prov.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Prov.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Prov.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
prov.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Prov. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: