1.2 sec in total
145 ms
907 ms
157 ms
Click here to check amazing Quick content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about quick.aero
A leader in global time-critical transportation and logistics solutions, meeting urgent shipping needs around the globe for over 30 years.
Visit quick.aeroWe analyzed Quick.aero page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
quick.aero performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
91/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value890 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.123
83/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
145 ms
142 ms
429 ms
160 ms
158 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Quick.aero, 8% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Quickstat.app101.hubspot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (429 ms) belongs to the original domain Quick.aero.
Page size can be reduced by 614.9 kB (57%)
1.1 MB
457.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Quick.aero main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 777.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Quick needs image optimization as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 559.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 559.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (49%)
39
20
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
quick.aero
145 ms
jquery.js
142 ms
jquery-plugins.js
429 ms
jquery-plugins.css
160 ms
zojax.css
158 ms
zojax.js
111 ms
common.css
90 ms
theme.css
185 ms
theme.js
183 ms
zojax.portlets.imagerotator.js
189 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
portlet-items-divider.gif
27 ms
button-search.png
44 ms
header-actions-divider.gif
27 ms
xlogo.pagespeed.ic.y33YBkI_b9.jpg
25 ms
842585878
64 ms
842585882
68 ms
842585880
72 ms
header-grad1.gif
39 ms
150xNx++attribute++image.pagespeed.ic.zv0lIWziaE.jpg
40 ms
150xNx++attribute++image.pagespeed.ic.rwtxa6YG7S.jpg
45 ms
150xNx++attribute++image.pagespeed.ic.XgTqOB1yku.jpg
46 ms
e414fdcfe6840fae41203ad131cd0631
76 ms
8c1f22d758734b378cc57a2d85a89521
139 ms
spinner.gif
55 ms
bg-gray-1x1.png
69 ms
++attribute++image
187 ms
bg-white-1x1.png
78 ms
++attribute++image
174 ms
++attribute++image
158 ms
++attribute++image
157 ms
++attribute++image
150 ms
376340178
153 ms
491502599
194 ms
2015-aatb-org.png
201 ms
2015-unos-org.png
194 ms
salog.js.aspx
80 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
14 ms
15486.js
144 ms
quick.aero accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
quick.aero best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
quick.aero SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Quick.aero can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Quick.aero main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
quick.aero
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Quick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: