3.2 sec in total
94 ms
1.6 sec
1.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Interactive Rock Content content for Brazil. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interactive.rockcontent.com
Rock Content empowers brands to launch the best content experiences using our best in class products and services.
Visit interactive.rockcontent.comWe analyzed Interactive.rockcontent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
interactive.rockcontent.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value3.4 s
90/100
10%
Value400 ms
68/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.9 s
66/100
10%
94 ms
321 ms
38 ms
44 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Interactive.rockcontent.com, 92% (68 requests) were made to Rockcontent.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (827 ms) relates to the external source Rockcontent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 248.2 kB (21%)
1.2 MB
942.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Interactive.rockcontent.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 754.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 244.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 244.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interactive Rock Content images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 89 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interactive.rockcontent.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (63%)
68
25
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interactive Rock Content. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interactive.rockcontent.com
94 ms
rockcontent.com
321 ms
rock-widgets-base.css
38 ms
frontend.css
44 ms
style.min.css
72 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
22 ms
post-19.css
27 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
32 ms
post-64160.css
38 ms
post-64154.css
44 ms
post-64151.css
45 ms
jquery.min.js
50 ms
frontend.js
55 ms
rockAnalytics.js
53 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
35 ms
j.php
69 ms
rock-bg-hero.png
138 ms
Rock-content-marketing-content.png
310 ms
font-inter-regular.woff
239 ms
font-inter-bold.woff
231 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
97 ms
post-64098.css
118 ms
post-64081.css
141 ms
post-64090.css
139 ms
post-64101.css
141 ms
post-64093.css
146 ms
animations.min.css
144 ms
email-decode.min.js
142 ms
rock-menu-and-switcher.min.js
207 ms
rock-lang-popup.min.js
208 ms
wp-embed.min.js
208 ms
rock-tabs.min.js
210 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
211 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
212 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
213 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
214 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
214 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
215 ms
hooks.min.js
215 ms
i18n.min.js
217 ms
frontend.min.js
217 ms
waypoints.min.js
231 ms
swiper.min.js
230 ms
frontend.min.js
228 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
239 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
240 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
240 ms
lazyload.min.js
282 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
209 ms
rock-bg-2-1.png
265 ms
v.gif
118 ms
tag-e5f303a314bd517c7598b46d61261412.js
53 ms
font-manrope-bold.woff
211 ms
font-manrope-regular.woff
232 ms
settings.js
43 ms
wa-interface.png
199 ms
WA_New-logo_FINAL-byRock-e1675244592484.png
280 ms
rock-content-ion-1.png
331 ms
Logo-Ion-1.png
207 ms
Image-4-1.png
270 ms
Logo-Stage.png
205 ms
Image-5-1.png
484 ms
Logo-Studio.png
433 ms
rock-content-ion-1.png
481 ms
rock-content-visually-min.png
488 ms
rock-content-stage.png
491 ms
rock-content-studio-1.png
547 ms
insight-icon.svg
450 ms
kit-icon.svg
603 ms
ebook-icn.svg
495 ms
rock-content-custom-gallery.png
728 ms
Rolf-Inge-Holden.png
504 ms
Drew-Bailey.png
787 ms
Jessie-Coan.png
827 ms
interactive.rockcontent.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
interactive.rockcontent.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
interactive.rockcontent.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interactive.rockcontent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interactive.rockcontent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interactive.rockcontent.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interactive Rock Content. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: