Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

railwaytrackmaterial.com

Railway Track Materials,Railway Track Fittings,Railway Track Manufacturer,Railway Track Fittings Exporter,India

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

87 ms

Resources Loaded

717 ms

Page Rendered

338 ms

railwaytrackmaterial.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Railway Track Material content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about railwaytrackmaterial.com

N. Mohanlal Railtrack, Railway track materials, railway track fittings, railway track manufacturer, track materials supplier, railway track fittings exporter india, railway track materials india, rail...

Visit railwaytrackmaterial.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Railwaytrackmaterial.com page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

railwaytrackmaterial.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.053

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

railwaytrackmaterial.com

87 ms

www.railwaytrackmaterial.com

294 ms

www.railwaytrackmaterial.com

229 ms

dtstyle_42_min.css

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Railwaytrackmaterial.com, 25% (1 request) were made to Tdw.imimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (294 ms) belongs to the original domain Railwaytrackmaterial.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.3 kB (66%)

Content Size

76.7 kB

After Optimization

26.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Railwaytrackmaterial.com main page is 76.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 62.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 50.3 kB

  • Original 62.6 kB
  • After minification 62.2 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 26 B

  • Original 14.0 kB
  • After minification 14.0 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Railwaytrackmaterial.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Railway Track Material. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

railwaytrackmaterial.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

railwaytrackmaterial.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

railwaytrackmaterial.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Railwaytrackmaterial.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Railwaytrackmaterial.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Railway Track Material. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: