4.9 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.9 sec
777 ms
Click here to check amazing R And C content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about randc.ca
Combining large accounting firm specialized expertise with hands-on working relationships. Our team of experts have the skills to address whatever comes your business way.
Visit randc.caWe analyzed Randc.ca page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
randc.ca performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value37.8 s
0/100
10%
Value7,720 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.119
84/100
15%
Value15.8 s
6/100
10%
1243 ms
126 ms
126 ms
215 ms
83 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Randc.ca, 24% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Randc.ca.
Page size can be reduced by 101.3 kB (11%)
898.3 kB
797.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Randc.ca main page is 898.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 613.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. R And C images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Randc.ca has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (69%)
58
18
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R And C. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
randc.ca
1243 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
126 ms
ddp-admin-vb.css
126 ms
style.min.css
215 ms
css
83 ms
style.css
218 ms
css
83 ms
dashicons.min.css
151 ms
jquery.min.js
382 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
128 ms
et-core-unified-1120-16631036202442.min.css
201 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
500 ms
falkor-footers.css
366 ms
falkor-headers.css
501 ms
mermaid_16_buttons_with_hover_effects_kit.css
500 ms
mozart-consulting.css
541 ms
mozart-footer.css
526 ms
mozart-header.css
501 ms
pixie-content.css
542 ms
pixie-master.css
542 ms
footer-unicorn-divi-layout-kit.css
542 ms
tina-person-module-my-thumb.css
737 ms
clipboard.min.js
738 ms
jquery.alphanum.js
737 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
757 ms
i18n.min.js
738 ms
ddp-admin.js
738 ms
custom.unified.js
761 ms
common.js
756 ms
wp-embed.min.js
731 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
710 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
710 ms
falkor_divi.js
707 ms
mermaid_divi.js
710 ms
mozart_divi.js
709 ms
pixie_divi.js
709 ms
unicorn_divi.js
711 ms
tinaPersonModuleMyThumb.js
712 ms
RandC-Logo-NEW-web.png
348 ms
RC-Main-page-header.jpg
274 ms
RC-Icons_Innovitave.jpg
274 ms
RC-Icons_Expert.jpg
271 ms
RC-Icons_Accountable.jpg
316 ms
finance-header-lline.png
273 ms
RC-Icons_Innovative-tax-planning.png
275 ms
RC-Icons_Tax-Planning.png
275 ms
RC-Icons_Advisory.png
316 ms
RC-Icons_Start-your-business.png
318 ms
RC-Icons_Grow-your-business.png
337 ms
RC-Icons_Know-your-business.png
337 ms
Ray-Photo-375-556.jpg
389 ms
RoyPhoto-375-556.jpg
363 ms
Stu-375-556.jpg
351 ms
Glentestimonial.png
463 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
45 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
43 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
49 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
47 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
43 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEw.woff
42 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff
45 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEw.woff
45 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEw.woff
48 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntG.woff
45 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff
82 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEw.woff
86 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEw.woff
78 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEw.woff
78 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
77 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff
74 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff
76 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
78 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff
81 ms
modules.ttf
194 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
64 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
65 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
163 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
120 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
67 ms
randc.ca accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
randc.ca best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
randc.ca SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Randc.ca can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Randc.ca main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
randc.ca
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of R And C. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: