2.1 sec in total
136 ms
1.4 sec
571 ms
Visit rangementspacer.com now to see the best up-to-date Rangement Spacer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rangementspacer.com
Are you looking for custom storage? Contact the Spacer Storage team to meet all your organization needs.
Visit rangementspacer.comWe analyzed Rangementspacer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rangementspacer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
76/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value5.5 s
55/100
10%
Value8,200 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
136 ms
132 ms
29 ms
7 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Rangementspacer.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (778 ms) belongs to the original domain Rangementspacer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 727.1 kB (23%)
3.2 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Rangementspacer.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rangement Spacer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 290.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 290.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 368.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rangementspacer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 368.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (60%)
48
19
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rangement Spacer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rangementspacer.com
136 ms
132 ms
css
29 ms
font-awesome.min.css
7 ms
main.min.css
47 ms
prettyphoto.css
116 ms
responsive-slider.css
173 ms
resetpopup.css
55 ms
dsi.animations.css
78 ms
main.css
176 ms
conversion.js
16 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
11 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
8 ms
bootstrap.min.js
6 ms
json2.js
107 ms
knockout-2.2.0.js
418 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
131 ms
jquery-dotnet-format.js
335 ms
jquery.urlencode.js
413 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.js
474 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
453 ms
jquery.autoellipses-1.0.10.min.js
452 ms
dsi.animations.js
387 ms
main.js
450 ms
cart.shoppingcart.js
452 ms
responsive-slider.js
558 ms
slider.js
470 ms
ga.js
129 ms
172 ms
furley_bg.png
280 ms
spacer.png
237 ms
rangement-garage-spacer-contur.jpg
559 ms
portes-coulissantes-spacer.jpg
620 ms
walk-inn_01.jpg
778 ms
3-gms0883.jpg
731 ms
4-walk-in-spacer.jpg
548 ms
slogan1.jpg
522 ms
overlayimg.png
604 ms
slogan2.jpg
600 ms
slogan3.jpg
658 ms
slogan4.jpg
715 ms
realise-par-volcan.png
717 ms
75 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
56 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
73 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
94 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
94 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
41 ms
__utm.gif
70 ms
j5johDXU1z4
90 ms
85 ms
86 ms
collect
86 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
78 ms
www-embed-player.js
102 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
12 ms
ad_status.js
69 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
63 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
67 ms
print.css
25 ms
rangementspacer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rangementspacer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rangementspacer.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rangementspacer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rangementspacer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rangementspacer.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rangement Spacer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: