Tools & Wizards About Us
rankfame.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

rankfame.com

RankFame Magazine - RankFame

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

rankfame.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rankfame.com homepage info - get ready to check Rank Fame best content right away, or after learning these important things about rankfame.com

All the topics, expert advice, tips, and resources will help you start a business from scratch.

Visit rankfame.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rankfame.com page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rankfame.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rankfame.com

121 ms

rankfame.com

450 ms

gppstub.js

51 ms

js

111 ms

ccpaplus.js

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Rankfame.com, 33% (17 requests) were made to Ezojs.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to The.gatekeeperconsent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (644 ms) belongs to the original domain Rankfame.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 233.8 kB (49%)

Content Size

473.2 kB

After Optimization

239.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rankfame.com main page is 473.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 271.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 228.4 kB

  • Original 271.9 kB
  • After minification 271.9 kB
  • After compression 43.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 228.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 10.5 kB
  • After minification 6.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rank Fame needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 36% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 924 B

  • Original 138.4 kB
  • After minification 138.4 kB
  • After compression 137.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 655 B

  • Original 52.4 kB
  • After minification 52.4 kB
  • After compression 51.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rankfame.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (92%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rank Fame. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rankfame.com

rankfame.com

121 ms

rankfame.com

rankfame.com

450 ms

gppstub.js

gppstub.js

51 ms

js

js

111 ms

ccpaplus.js

ccpaplus.js

66 ms

navigation.min.js

navigation.min.js

37 ms

kt-social-min.js

kt-social-min.js

58 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

189 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

105 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

57 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

191 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

141 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

192 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

190 ms

v.js

v.js

55 ms

boise.js

boise.js

142 ms

abilene.js

abilene.js

157 ms

tulsa.js

tulsa.js

152 ms

et.js

et.js

150 ms

lazy_load.js

lazy_load.js

159 ms

css_onload.js

css_onload.js

106 ms

drake.js

drake.js

106 ms

jellyfish.js

jellyfish.js

123 ms

Rankfame-logo.png

Rankfame-logo.png

88 ms

Google-Knowledge-Panel-Service.png

Google-Knowledge-Panel-Service.png

91 ms

global.min.css

global.min.css

103 ms

menu-addon.css

menu-addon.css

22 ms

kt-social.css

kt-social.css

100 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

113 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

107 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

229 ms

post-1115.css

post-1115.css

102 ms

global.css

global.css

104 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

241 ms

css

css

102 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

248 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

254 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

256 ms

header.min.css

header.min.css

228 ms

content.min.css

content.min.css

230 ms

footer.min.css

footer.min.css

233 ms

f3791b6170b5caa3737b678089ca6ec1.css

f3791b6170b5caa3737b678089ca6ec1.css

249 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

644 ms

screx.js

screx.js

14 ms

mulvane.js

mulvane.js

33 ms

wichita.js

wichita.js

13 ms

raleigh.js

raleigh.js

34 ms

vista.js

vista.js

34 ms

olathe.js

olathe.js

125 ms

script_delay.js

script_delay.js

125 ms

vitals.js

vitals.js

133 ms

chanute.js

chanute.js

126 ms

Accessibility Review

rankfame.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

rankfame.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rankfame.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rankfame.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rankfame.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rankfame.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rank Fame. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: