5.7 sec in total
796 ms
4.7 sec
159 ms
Click here to check amazing Ranking 2 content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ranking2.com
Visit ranking2.comWe analyzed Ranking2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 796 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Ranking2.com rating and web reputation
ranking2.com performance score
796 ms
369 ms
777 ms
575 ms
763 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Ranking2.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to S10.histats.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ranking2.com.
Page size can be reduced by 706.6 kB (38%)
1.8 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Ranking2.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ranking 2 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 294.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 294.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 278.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ranking2.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 278.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (62%)
39
15
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ranking 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ranking2.com
796 ms
css
369 ms
bootstrap.css
777 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
575 ms
Mystyle.css
763 ms
slimmenu.css
397 ms
notifIt.css
406 ms
font-awesome.min.css
742 ms
style.css
768 ms
style.mod.css
591 ms
modernizr
757 ms
jquery.min.js
9 ms
jquery.js
2345 ms
wowslider.js
2340 ms
script.js
2343 ms
jquery
2166 ms
jquery-2.1.1.min.js
2167 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
2163 ms
jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js
2166 ms
jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js
2167 ms
bootstrap.min.js
2167 ms
jquery.slimmenu.min.js
2169 ms
notifIt.js
2169 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
2170 ms
jquery.easy-ticker.min.js
2169 ms
jquery.easy-ticker.js
2170 ms
js15.js
11 ms
Header.jpg
764 ms
online
155 ms
1.jpg
911 ms
2.jpg
568 ms
1.jpg
270 ms
2.jpg
271 ms
Rank.jpg
388 ms
Money.jpg
737 ms
Loading.gif
374 ms
Package.png
563 ms
footer.jpg
954 ms
0.php
16 ms
BKoodakBold.woff
742 ms
bullet.png
722 ms
arrows.png
769 ms
pause.png
662 ms
BKoodakBold.ttf
210 ms
ranking2.com SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ranking2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ranking2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ranking2.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ranking 2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: