10.8 sec in total
688 ms
9.2 sec
931 ms
Click here to check amazing Rao Hospital content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about raohospital.com
Rao Hospital is the best gynaecology hospital in Coimbatore. We are one of the leading hospitals for IVF, IUI, ICSI Treatment in Coimbatore, India.
Visit raohospital.comWe analyzed Raohospital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 688 ms and then it took 10.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
raohospital.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value22.0 s
0/100
25%
Value32.6 s
0/100
10%
Value20,030 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.487
17/100
15%
Value36.5 s
0/100
10%
688 ms
2684 ms
120 ms
435 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 134 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Raohospital.com, 20% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Raohospital.com.
Page size can be reduced by 345.5 kB (18%)
1.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Raohospital.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 166.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 166.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rao Hospital images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 138.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.4 kB or 31% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raohospital.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (75%)
101
25
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rao Hospital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
raohospital.com
688 ms
www.raohospital.com
2684 ms
js
120 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
435 ms
css
51 ms
components.css
964 ms
style.css
1003 ms
styles.css
754 ms
settings.css
737 ms
slick.min.css
757 ms
font-awesome.min.css
761 ms
wp-carousel-free-public.min.css
971 ms
font-awesome.min.css
72 ms
slick.css
1044 ms
testimonials-style.css
1066 ms
js_composer.min.css
1316 ms
www.raohospital.com
1386 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
66 ms
css
32 ms
classic-10_7.css
60 ms
mc-validate.js
86 ms
jquery.js
1600 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1075 ms
tracking-analytics-events.min.js
1120 ms
tracking-scrolldepth.min.js
1150 ms
components.js
1954 ms
theme.js
1592 ms
scripts.js
1592 ms
jquery.themepunch.enablelog.js
1592 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
2014 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
2013 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
2012 ms
revolution.extension.carousel.min.js
2009 ms
revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js
2004 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
2390 ms
revolution.extension.migration.min.js
2387 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
2387 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
2386 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
2388 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
2388 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
2664 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2624 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
2641 ms
shortcodes-3rd.js
2684 ms
css
35 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
35 ms
font-awesome.min.css
2677 ms
vc_carousel.min.css
2388 ms
js_composer_tta.min.css
2343 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
2279 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
2323 ms
fm-animate.css
2308 ms
dashicons.min.css
2360 ms
shortcodes.js
2131 ms
transition.min.js
2449 ms
vc_carousel.min.js
2435 ms
skrollr.min.js
2412 ms
vc-accordion.min.js
2258 ms
vc-tta-autoplay.min.js
2208 ms
vc-tabs.min.js
2409 ms
widget.min.js
2371 ms
analytics.js
351 ms
effect.min.js
2045 ms
js
452 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshRTA.woff
388 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhRTA.woff
447 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDshRTA.woff
704 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmRTA.woff
451 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmRTA.woff
703 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmRTA.woff
704 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImRTA.woff
704 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
225 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQV3w.woff
705 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQV3w.woff
769 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7QV3w.woff
705 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMV3w.woff
705 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7MV3w.woff
835 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMV3w.woff
834 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7MV3w.woff
833 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv18I.woff
836 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o18I.woff
836 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o18I.woff
885 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkKEo18I.woff
885 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxM.woff
890 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAA.woff
888 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff
887 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAA.woff
887 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff
891 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAA.woff
891 ms
effect-shake.min.js
1965 ms
main_div_front_end.js
1964 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2398 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2731 ms
bg-content-bottom.jpeg
866 ms
linkid.js
391 ms
collect
731 ms
collect
728 ms
default
675 ms
1400x500-1.png
2731 ms
3.jpg
2202 ms
2.jpg
2482 ms
3-e1503319427765.jpg
2127 ms
5.jpg
2243 ms
4.jpg
2831 ms
collect
295 ms
collect
295 ms
collect
296 ms
collect
123 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
90-x-90.png
947 ms
coloredbg.png
606 ms
loader.gif
615 ms
10-e1593238752468.jpg
1192 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3iQ.woff
21 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
22 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
21 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1064 ms
9.jpg
534 ms
6-e1508929833455.jpg
526 ms
5.jpg
762 ms
8.jpg
1059 ms
7.jpg
816 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
191 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
245 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
219 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
252 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
208 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
234 ms
twk-main.js
244 ms
twk-vendor.js
311 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
366 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
382 ms
twk-runtime.js
293 ms
twk-app.js
292 ms
raohospital.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
raohospital.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
raohospital.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raohospital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Raohospital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
raohospital.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rao Hospital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: