3.5 sec in total
119 ms
3.2 sec
197 ms
Visit rcrp.com now to see the best up-to-date Rcrp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rcrp.com
Welcome to Rocky Creek Village where Compassion, Care and Community is at the core of what we do, day to day! We are a 55 plus community and are the… read more →
Visit rcrp.comWe analyzed Rcrp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 119 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rcrp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value15.1 s
1/100
10%
Value1,020 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.129
82/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
119 ms
1857 ms
88 ms
132 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rcrp.com, 76% (81 requests) were made to Rockycreekvillageseniorliving.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Rockycreekvillageseniorliving.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (55%)
2.1 MB
961.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Rcrp.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 751.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 111.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rcrp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 518.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 518.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 493.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rcrp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 493.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (71%)
104
30
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rcrp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rcrp.com
119 ms
www.rockycreekvillageseniorliving.com
1857 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
88 ms
basic.css
132 ms
headers.css
118 ms
bootstrap.css
114 ms
shortcodes.css
140 ms
flexslider.css
124 ms
prettyPhoto.css
152 ms
style.css
169 ms
skeleton.css
174 ms
responsive.css
210 ms
styles.css
221 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
200 ms
jquery-ui-spinner.css
205 ms
calendar-jos.css
227 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
233 ms
style_submissions.css
247 ms
settings.css
290 ms
jetpack.css
321 ms
jquery.js
385 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
292 ms
js
58 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
310 ms
jelly.min.js
341 ms
file-upload.js
341 ms
calendar.js
398 ms
calendar_function.js
360 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
423 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
438 ms
easing.js
404 ms
fitvids.js
415 ms
css
39 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
469 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
484 ms
comment-reply.min.js
440 ms
photon.js
467 ms
jquery.form.min.js
472 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
10 ms
gprofiles.js
58 ms
e-201611.js
10 ms
scripts.js
471 ms
widget.min.js
439 ms
core.min.js
422 ms
mouse.min.js
423 ms
slider.min.js
425 ms
button.min.js
422 ms
spinner.min.js
416 ms
effect.min.js
430 ms
style.css
426 ms
effect-shake.min.js
434 ms
wpgroho.js
407 ms
shortcodes.js
407 ms
bootstrap.js
398 ms
superfish.js
412 ms
mobilemenu.js
417 ms
waypoints.js
412 ms
waypoints-sticky.js
410 ms
gauge.js
416 ms
functions.js
382 ms
prettyPhoto.js
387 ms
jquery.tweet.min.js
378 ms
basic.css
97 ms
awesome.css
119 ms
bootstrap.css
117 ms
shortcodes.css
128 ms
flexslider.css
134 ms
prettyPhoto.css
143 ms
woocommerce.css
157 ms
sunset-background.jpg
33 ms
trees2-background.jpg
34 ms
security-background.jpg
32 ms
Compassion-Care-Community.gif
26 ms
Street.jpg
32 ms
Walkers.jpg
28 ms
Pool_slide.jpg
27 ms
facebook.png
183 ms
rss.png
66 ms
RCV_Logo_Color-no-tag_250px.png
66 ms
RCV_Logo_Color-no-tag_500px.png
187 ms
RCV_Logo_Color-no-tag_320px1.png
184 ms
Slider-Photo2a.jpg
184 ms
Slider-Photo1.jpg
185 ms
Slide-Photo3_400x200px.jpg
185 ms
transparent.png
27 ms
Home.jpg
25 ms
Lunch-buddies.jpg
25 ms
Couple-slide.jpg
27 ms
Green-block.png
26 ms
Logo-screen.jpg
26 ms
Pavilion.jpg
27 ms
Independent-living.jpg
30 ms
Assisted-living.jpg
29 ms
Pavilion.jpg
28 ms
timer.png
162 ms
shadow.png
141 ms
testimonials.png
150 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
190 ms
hovercard.css
40 ms
services.css
54 ms
loader.gif
75 ms
slider-prev.png
74 ms
slider-next.png
73 ms
small_left.png
73 ms
small_right.png
74 ms
g.gif
3 ms
retina.css
51 ms
rcrp.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rcrp.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rcrp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rcrp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rcrp.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rcrp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: