4.6 sec in total
503 ms
3.7 sec
485 ms
Click here to check amazing Re Port content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about re-port.ru
Рекламные агентства. Отраслевой портал о маркетинге, рекламе и PR. Новости, аналитика, календарь событий. Деловая и справочная информация.
Visit re-port.ruWe analyzed Re-port.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 503 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
re-port.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value260 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.357
30/100
15%
Value13.7 s
11/100
10%
503 ms
1178 ms
35 ms
129 ms
254 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Re-port.ru, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Xevian.signica.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 164.5 kB (10%)
1.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Re-port.ru main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 92.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Re Port images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Re-port.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (52%)
58
28
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Port. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
re-port.ru
503 ms
re-port.ru
1178 ms
font-awesome.min.css
35 ms
bootstrap.min.css
129 ms
grid.css
254 ms
chosen.min.css
372 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
374 ms
jquery-ui.structure.min.css
373 ms
jquery-ui.theme.min.css
376 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
378 ms
datepicker.css
378 ms
daterangepicker-bs3.css
494 ms
main.css
497 ms
patch.css
495 ms
context.js
1007 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
621 ms
bootstrap.min.js
505 ms
newsTicker.js
504 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
615 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
616 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
619 ms
jquery.cookie.js
629 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
628 ms
plupload.full.min.js
863 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
741 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
745 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.ru.js
743 ms
daterangepicker.js
752 ms
main.js
751 ms
xevian.min.js
1827 ms
css
37 ms
GothamPro.css
372 ms
progress.gif
133 ms
logo.png
133 ms
search.png
132 ms
11111_64_908.jpg
247 ms
img_4177.jpg
248 ms
martin_15_107.png
161 ms
img_20191119_123904.jpg
380 ms
img_4165.jpg
378 ms
avmva.jpeg
379 ms
ucep.jpg
408 ms
yarko_zg_smm_mult-cover_1920.jpg
379 ms
bez_nazvaniya_33_345.png
504 ms
logo_14_68.png
992 ms
0_44_851.jpg
502 ms
proofmasteroof.png
888 ms
image1_64_781.jpg
627 ms
0_34_916.jpg
541 ms
0_17_144.jpg
626 ms
IMG_20160429_200847.jpg
627 ms
0_26_250.jpg
659 ms
IMG_20181221_090602.jpg
749 ms
00003_-_kopiya.jpg
750 ms
minimarker-1.jpg
752 ms
ejednevniki_Portobello_2018.jpg
786 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4taVc.ttf
69 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4taVc.ttf
72 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4taVc.ttf
100 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4taVc.ttf
123 ms
GothamProMedium.woff
818 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
58 ms
aci.js
675 ms
hit
514 ms
watch.js
1 ms
ga.js
111 ms
facebook.png
805 ms
vk.png
818 ms
tw.png
842 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
185 ms
182 ms
179 ms
re-port.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
re-port.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
re-port.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Re-port.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Re-port.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
re-port.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Re Port. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: