Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

548 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

150 ms

recruiters.retailchoice.com screenshot

About Website

Visit recruiters.retailchoice.com now to see the best up-to-date Recruiters Retailchoice content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about recruiters.retailchoice.com

retailchoice.com

Visit recruiters.retailchoice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Recruiters.retailchoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 548 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

recruiters.retailchoice.com performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,170 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.417

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.0 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

recruiters.retailchoice.com

548 ms

551f1d1a72816a0db7d718e2a690527e.js

435 ms

base.css

164 ms

content.css

239 ms

special-offer.css

163 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Recruiters.retailchoice.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.krxd.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (548 ms) belongs to the original domain Recruiters.retailchoice.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 956.4 kB (70%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

408.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Recruiters.retailchoice.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 868.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 33.0 kB
  • After minification 29.5 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 92.9 kB
  • After minification 85.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Recruiters Retailchoice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 613.0 kB

  • Original 868.8 kB
  • After minification 867.4 kB
  • After compression 255.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 613.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 311.3 kB

  • Original 370.2 kB
  • After minification 310.8 kB
  • After compression 58.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Recruiters.retailchoice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 311.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (65%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Recruiters Retailchoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

recruiters.retailchoice.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

recruiters.retailchoice.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

recruiters.retailchoice.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Recruiters.retailchoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Recruiters.retailchoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Recruiters Retailchoice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: