6.7 sec in total
2.2 sec
4.3 sec
212 ms
Visit reintroduce.me now to see the best up-to-date Reintroduce content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reintroduce.me
Visit reintroduce.meWe analyzed Reintroduce.me page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
reintroduce.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value1.6 s
99/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
2226 ms
124 ms
69 ms
74 ms
133 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Reintroduce.me, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Reintroduce.me.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (75%)
1.8 MB
449.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Reintroduce.me main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 873.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reintroduce images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 656.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 656.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 642.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reintroduce.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 642.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (84%)
51
8
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reintroduce. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reintroduce.me
2226 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
124 ms
css
69 ms
css
74 ms
styles.css
133 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
126 ms
woocommerce.css
95 ms
rgs.css
123 ms
font-awesome.min.css
145 ms
style.css
235 ms
responsive.css
209 ms
woocommerce.css
204 ms
js_composer.css
256 ms
jetpack.css
228 ms
jquery.js
288 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
263 ms
modernizr.js
269 ms
core.min.js
180 ms
widget.min.js
188 ms
position.min.js
185 ms
menu.min.js
283 ms
autocomplete.min.js
284 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
288 ms
photon.js
284 ms
jquery.form.min.js
284 ms
scripts.js
280 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
298 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
299 ms
woocommerce.min.js
298 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
299 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
327 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
53 ms
wpgroho.js
347 ms
superfish.js
343 ms
respond.js
353 ms
sticky.js
345 ms
prettyPhoto.js
347 ms
isotope.min.js
410 ms
init.js
503 ms
e-201611.js
6 ms
comment-reply.min.js
389 ms
js_composer_front.js
444 ms
logo4.png
35 ms
logo_graphic_white.png
33 ms
re-dk.jpg
33 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
151 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNbE_oMaV8t2eFeISPpzbdE.woff
27 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMa9awK0IKUjIWABZIchFI8.woff
34 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
143 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
208 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
421 ms
admin-ajax.php
1447 ms
hovercard.css
114 ms
services.css
116 ms
g.gif
33 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
108 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
56 ms
reintroduce.me accessibility score
reintroduce.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
reintroduce.me SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reintroduce.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reintroduce.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reintroduce.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reintroduce. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: