Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 85

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

relatedgroup.com

Related Group - Real Estate Development & Lifestyle Company

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

808 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

392 ms

relatedgroup.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Related Group content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about relatedgroup.com

Since 1979, Related Group has enhanced skylines with real estate development characterized by innovative design, enduring quality and inclusive living. Learn more.

Visit relatedgroup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Relatedgroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 808 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

relatedgroup.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.043

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

relatedgroup.com

808 ms

css

33 ms

gallery-bank.css

122 ms

prettyPhoto.css

126 ms

style.css

129 ms

Our browser made a total of 166 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (106 requests) were addressed to the original Relatedgroup.com, 22% (37 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to S.w.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Relatedgroup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (30%)

Content Size

8.9 MB

After Optimization

6.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Relatedgroup.com main page is 8.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 79.2 kB

  • Original 102.3 kB
  • After minification 90.3 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 67.1 kB

  • Original 5.6 MB
  • After minification 5.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Related Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 495.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 206.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Relatedgroup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 99 (62%)

Requests Now

160

After Optimization

61

The browser has sent 160 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Related Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 42 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

relatedgroup.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

relatedgroup.com best practices score

85

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

relatedgroup.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Relatedgroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Relatedgroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Related Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: