6.9 sec in total
114 ms
4.6 sec
2.2 sec
Welcome to resultstechnology.com homepage info - get ready to check RESULTS Technology best content right away, or after learning these important things about resultstechnology.com
Award-winning IT Support Company in St. Louis & Kansas City. Our managed IT services manage your technology so you can focus on your business.
Visit resultstechnology.comWe analyzed Resultstechnology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 114 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
resultstechnology.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value1,560 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value17.5 s
4/100
10%
114 ms
681 ms
43 ms
210 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Resultstechnology.com, 16% (16 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to S.adroll.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source S.adroll.com.
Page size can be reduced by 294.9 kB (10%)
2.8 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Resultstechnology.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 213.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 213.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RESULTS Technology images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resultstechnology.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (67%)
82
27
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RESULTS Technology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
resultstechnology.com
114 ms
www.resultstechnology.com
681 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
43 ms
style.min.css
210 ms
fl-icons.css
49 ms
basic.min.css
87 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
83 ms
theme.min.css
60 ms
pum-site-styles.css
82 ms
flatsome.css
63 ms
style.css
94 ms
css
203 ms
jquery.min.js
94 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
92 ms
jquery.json.min.js
93 ms
gravityforms.min.js
94 ms
t.js
187 ms
payload.js
904 ms
212038.js
343 ms
flatsome-live-search.js
115 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
115 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
115 ms
dom-ready.min.js
115 ms
hooks.min.js
118 ms
i18n.min.js
194 ms
a11y.min.js
180 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
194 ms
core.min.js
194 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
213 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
214 ms
flatsome.js
219 ms
css
142 ms
css2
137 ms
627970fb55aa0f00124ea405
760 ms
gtm.js
700 ms
final-logo.svg
93 ms
skinny-image-clip-733x1024.png
760 ms
star-orange.png
619 ms
NPC.jpg
622 ms
Hire-Vets.jpg
617 ms
VERTICAL.jpg
622 ms
Artboard-1.png
624 ms
msp100_usa_21-1024x534.png
687 ms
cba-.png
682 ms
SOC.jpg
683 ms
ks_overland-park_managed-service-providers_2022_transparent.webp
682 ms
IOWA.jpg
685 ms
IT_Services_Kansas_2021-947x1024.png
750 ms
IT_Services_Missouri_2021-947x1024.png
744 ms
upcity.png
742 ms
CBA-ENDORSED-LOGO-light.png
752 ms
10results-944x1024.png
884 ms
p.js
581 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
672 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
810 ms
K2F-fZ5fmddNBik.ttf
217 ms
fl-icons.ttf
82 ms
analytics.js
953 ms
roundtrip.js
1056 ms
insight.min.js
1056 ms
WidgetScript
806 ms
ks_overland-park_managed-service-providers_2022_transparent.webp
91 ms
collect
58 ms
collect
105 ms
results-blue-bg2.svg
22 ms
index.js
55 ms
it-employees.jpg
304 ms
index.js
16 ms
4UWXJ2372VDIDPZXRRZKRD
44 ms
WONPNS4ISFEDZEJE563B4U.js
15 ms
fbevents.js
105 ms
out
53 ms
out
104 ms
out
121 ms
out
128 ms
out
124 ms
out
127 ms
out
123 ms
out
127 ms
out
143 ms
out
146 ms
out
148 ms
out
140 ms
out
143 ms
sync
522 ms
857088997705924
152 ms
pixel
303 ms
tap.php
434 ms
Pug
497 ms
pixel
36 ms
in
21 ms
sd
88 ms
rum
81 ms
in
74 ms
bounce
29 ms
xuid
18 ms
19 ms
res.js
332 ms
1ff4ec0b-8a20-443c-9fc8-a8cb69a6c06c
70 ms
13
55 ms
version
3 ms
modern_initializer.13834.js
68 ms
modern_app.13834.js
35 ms
resultstechnology.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
resultstechnology.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
resultstechnology.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resultstechnology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Resultstechnology.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
resultstechnology.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RESULTS Technology. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: