Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

reverserecords.org

Public Records Search | Enter Name, Phone, Email | InfoTracer

Page Load Speed

412 ms in total

First Response

81 ms

Resources Loaded

150 ms

Page Rendered

181 ms

reverserecords.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reverserecords.org homepage info - get ready to check Reverse Records best content right away, or after learning these important things about reverserecords.org

Access over 5 billion public records nationwide - arrests, criminal records, assets, vital records, court records, and much more!

Visit reverserecords.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Reverserecords.org page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 331 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reverserecords.org performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,990 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.523

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reverserecords.org

81 ms

rrlogo.gif

22 ms

autotab.js

36 ms

member_only.gif

25 ms

rr2.jpg

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Reverserecords.org, 10% (1 request) were made to Ssnrecords.org and 10% (1 request) were made to Courtrecords.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (81 ms) belongs to the original domain Reverserecords.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.7 kB (78%)

Content Size

69.0 kB

After Optimization

15.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Reverserecords.org main page is 69.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 53.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 45.9 kB

  • Original 53.4 kB
  • After minification 36.1 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.3 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 15.6 kB
  • After minification 7.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Reverse Records needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 50% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reverse Records. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

reverserecords.org accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

reverserecords.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reverserecords.org SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reverserecords.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reverserecords.org main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reverse Records. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: