3.9 sec in total
956 ms
2.7 sec
203 ms
Visit reviewpon.com now to see the best up-to-date Reviewpon content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reviewpon.com
Reviewpon has done all the hard work, so you don't have to experiment with bad hosting companies. We give a full breakdown of each provider and rank 'em.
Visit reviewpon.comWe analyzed Reviewpon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 956 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
reviewpon.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.245
51/100
15%
Value3.3 s
93/100
10%
956 ms
26 ms
38 ms
40 ms
88 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewpon.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (956 ms) belongs to the original domain Reviewpon.com.
Page size can be reduced by 512.5 kB (54%)
949.2 kB
436.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewpon.com main page is 949.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 350.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Reviewpon needs image optimization as it can save up to 83.0 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 232.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 232.4 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 166.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewpon.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 166.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (63%)
71
26
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviewpon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.reviewpon.com
956 ms
css
26 ms
css
38 ms
css
40 ms
styles.css
88 ms
css
52 ms
dashicons.min.css
241 ms
thickbox.css
154 ms
base.css
143 ms
prettyphoto.css
146 ms
fontawesome.css
147 ms
style.css
224 ms
style-responsive.css
209 ms
style.css
210 ms
masterslider.css
211 ms
ms-partialview.css
216 ms
lightbox.min.css
273 ms
jquery.js
407 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
292 ms
core.js
298 ms
general.js
302 ms
jquery-cycle.js
305 ms
jquery-prettyphoto.js
340 ms
jquery.min.js
45 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
6 ms
masterslider.min.js
436 ms
masterslider.partialview.js
362 ms
css
23 ms
css
41 ms
jquery.zclip.js
380 ms
component.css
370 ms
modernizr.custom.js
434 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
447 ms
jquery.form.min.js
459 ms
scripts.js
460 ms
ssba.min.js
490 ms
core.min.js
491 ms
widget.min.js
512 ms
effect.min.js
529 ms
effect-fade.min.js
551 ms
thickbox.js
552 ms
comment-reply.min.js
552 ms
jquery.touchwipe.min.js
551 ms
jquery.lightbox.min.js
565 ms
wp-embed.min.js
584 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
551 ms
logo1.png
107 ms
slider1.png
276 ms
slider2.png
306 ms
slider3.png
275 ms
mddhostinglogo.png
274 ms
asmallorangelogo.png
280 ms
hostninelogo.png
276 ms
site5logo.png
276 ms
godaddylogo.png
310 ms
downtownhostlogo.png
336 ms
stablehostlogo.png
385 ms
hostmonsterlogo.png
330 ms
hostgatorlogo.png
404 ms
sitegroundlogo.png
372 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
contact.png
368 ms
watch.jpg
388 ms
footertwitter.png
394 ms
black_50.png
430 ms
count.js
68 ms
lato-light-webfont.ttf
466 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
20 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
21 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
38 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
24 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
38 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
36 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
36 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
491 ms
collect
24 ms
collect
74 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
307 ms
loading-2.gif
307 ms
reviewpon.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
reviewpon.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
reviewpon.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewpon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Reviewpon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewpon.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reviewpon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: