51.9 sec in total
534 ms
7.8 sec
43.6 sec
Welcome to reviewrevitol.com homepage info - get ready to check Reviewrevitol best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about reviewrevitol.com
Authentic
Visit reviewrevitol.comWe analyzed Reviewrevitol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 534 ms and then it took 51.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
reviewrevitol.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value3.3 s
68/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.08
94/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
534 ms
335 ms
377 ms
1335 ms
1011 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewrevitol.com, 17% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 13% (3 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.9 sec) relates to the external source Lh3.googleusercontent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 308.7 kB (27%)
1.1 MB
822.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewrevitol.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 651.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reviewrevitol images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 234.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 234.8 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewrevitol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (27%)
22
16
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviewrevitol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewrevitol.com
534 ms
style.css
335 ms
css
377 ms
adsbygoogle.js
1335 ms
rock-cycle.jpg
1011 ms
kids-math-worksheets-printable-1.jpg
1482 ms
Run-On-Sentences-Re-Writing-P-1-Intermediate.png
825 ms
myEZ4jtby_dmNbH_rUJ617Y3CBjBwU4S06vCC69VoeG_VnRbAKSoizVeZFKko_eHxQ=h900
4896 ms
968c67cc664995864ed425d22864d1b49d419873_180.jpg
4669 ms
preview.png
1090 ms
reading-comprehension-effect-third-grade.png
4670 ms
original-541818-1.jpg
4670 ms
398993fc48ba8331c5223e694e1404b2.jpg
4557 ms
ca-pub-7480161829760442.js
3803 ms
zrt_lookup.html
3541 ms
show_ads_impl.js
1243 ms
abdcba428a0ce2f5d6ec1a3678d4bd22.jpg
3493 ms
kids-math-worksheets-printable
2204 ms
ads
1678 ms
osd.js
1145 ms
ads
989 ms
jq.js
612 ms
lz.js
612 ms
js15_as.js
577 ms
reviewrevitol.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
reviewrevitol.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
reviewrevitol.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ID
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewrevitol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Reviewrevitol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewrevitol.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reviewrevitol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: