1.3 sec in total
60 ms
1.1 sec
131 ms
Welcome to rfjp.com homepage info - get ready to check RFJP best content right away, or after learning these important things about rfjp.com
We have your Ford GPW and Willys MB Military Jeep parts here. All the parts you are looking for in your restoration project.
Visit rfjp.comWe analyzed Rfjp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
rfjp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.309
38/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
60 ms
67 ms
393 ms
308 ms
90 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Rfjp.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (393 ms) belongs to the original domain Rfjp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 157.8 kB (15%)
1.0 MB
888.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Rfjp.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 661.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RFJP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 99.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.1 kB or 34% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfjp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (38%)
39
24
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RFJP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rfjp.com
60 ms
rfjp.com
67 ms
default.aspx
393 ms
jquery.min.js
308 ms
bootstrap.min.js
90 ms
jquery.js
99 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
251 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
259 ms
shop.plugins.css
234 ms
shop.style.css
114 ms
settings.css
252 ms
_bootstrap.css
352 ms
base.css
271 ms
style.css
274 ms
WebResource.axd
259 ms
formvalidate.js
291 ms
core.js
273 ms
ScriptResource.axd
282 ms
ScriptResource.axd
283 ms
css
30 ms
app.css
33 ms
shop.blocks.css
26 ms
animate.css
30 ms
header-v5.css
51 ms
footer-v4.css
28 ms
logo.gif
34 ms
jeep.jpg
35 ms
flipbook.jpg
33 ms
M38.jpg
34 ms
Dodge.jpg
107 ms
2039.jpg
33 ms
75.jpg
107 ms
135.jpg
105 ms
133.jpg
108 ms
2725.jpg
107 ms
2669.jpg
106 ms
1153.jpg
106 ms
1959.jpg
108 ms
2686.jpg
108 ms
2709.jpg
108 ms
2721.jpg
109 ms
414.jpg
108 ms
timer.png
80 ms
loader.gif
21 ms
bullet.png
20 ms
large_left.png
20 ms
large_right.png
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
33 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
18 ms
rfjp.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role] values are not valid
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
rfjp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rfjp.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfjp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rfjp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rfjp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RFJP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: