26.5 sec in total
286 ms
19.8 sec
6.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Rhodel content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rhodel.com
You deserve a winning digital strategy. This is your one stop for all of the latest information in the Digital space. Trends, tips, templates & more.
Visit rhodel.comWe analyzed Rhodel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 286 ms and then it took 26.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
rhodel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value4.4 s
38/100
25%
Value19.1 s
0/100
10%
Value34,880 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.196
63/100
15%
Value47.5 s
0/100
10%
286 ms
1342 ms
75 ms
215 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Rhodel.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (15.3 sec) relates to the external source Secure-a.vimeocdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 327.0 kB (26%)
1.2 MB
916.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Rhodel.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 654.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 157.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rhodel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhodel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (84%)
82
13
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rhodel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rhodel.com
286 ms
rhodel.com
1342 ms
adsbygoogle.js
75 ms
style.css
215 ms
js
132 ms
fb-comments-hidewpcomments.css
199 ms
formidableforms.css
427 ms
responsive.css
356 ms
headers.css
345 ms
font-awesome.min.css
360 ms
white.css
345 ms
style.min.css
492 ms
styles.css
536 ms
style.css
429 ms
front.css
475 ms
form.css
398 ms
css
155 ms
css
319 ms
front.css
394 ms
jquery.min.js
721 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
462 ms
encrypt.js
461 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
496 ms
powered-by.js
497 ms
fts-global.js
718 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
737 ms
jquery.cookie.js
721 ms
modenizr.min.js
724 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
724 ms
jquery.livequery.min.js
723 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
723 ms
jquery.superbgimage.min.js
724 ms
actionbox-helper.js
723 ms
webtoolkit.sprintf.js
723 ms
adsbygoogle.js
115 ms
widgets.js
105 ms
magic-action-box-styles.css
714 ms
style.css
714 ms
actionbox-22892.css
714 ms
custom-buttons.css
715 ms
ajax-form.js
714 ms
supersubs.js
716 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
15295 ms
superfish.js
715 ms
show_ads_impl.js
242 ms
zrt_lookup.html
82 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
584 ms
jquery.tipsy.min.js
523 ms
analytics.js
98 ms
custom.js
499 ms
responsive-videos.js
491 ms
new-tab.js
564 ms
general.js
563 ms
sdk.js
494 ms
commenting.js
494 ms
sharing.js
490 ms
fergcorp_countdownTimer_java.js
488 ms
form.js
554 ms
collect
25 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
499 ms
bg-scanlines-thumbs.png
383 ms
bg-top.png
383 ms
grid.png
382 ms
bg-scanlines.png
382 ms
R-logo-lrgB1.png
446 ms
R-logo-lrgB2x.png
298 ms
bg-sprite.png
297 ms
rhodel.comwww.quicksprout.comimage6-5aeff69f4e839469ed2ebbf6fec9bd09f6db55fa-980x250_c.jpg
293 ms
me-R2.jpg
158 ms
header11.png
224 ms
email.png
288 ms
linkedin.png
287 ms
rss.png
339 ms
twitter.png
339 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0yEwA.ttf
212 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OCtKA.ttf
209 ms
3y9I6aknfjLm_3lMKjiMgmUUYBs04aUXNxt9gW2LIftodtWZeWGP.ttf
215 ms
3y9I6aknfjLm_3lMKjiMgmUUYBs04aUXNxt9gW2LIftoqNWZeWGP.ttf
213 ms
3y9I6aknfjLm_3lMKjiMgmUUYBs04aUXNxt9gW2LIfto9tWZeWGP.ttf
214 ms
3y9I6aknfjLm_3lMKjiMgmUUYBs04aUXNxt9gW2LIftoEdKZeWGP.ttf
207 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
361 ms
cookie.js
252 ms
integrator.js
235 ms
ads
142 ms
icon-comment.png
192 ms
me-R2.jpg
361 ms
bg-thmb-photo.png
147 ms
header11.png
237 ms
spinner.gif
115 ms
widgets.js
145 ms
ga.js
76 ms
sdk.js
65 ms
sdk.js
63 ms
__utm.gif
42 ms
33 ms
widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html
572 ms
rhodel.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
rhodel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
rhodel.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhodel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rhodel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rhodel.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rhodel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: