6.5 sec in total
1.3 sec
4.9 sec
286 ms
Click here to check amazing Richardson Roofing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about richardson-roofing.com
Richardson Roofing is a building envelope commercial roofing contractor, able to take projects from design concept through to finished installation
Visit richardson-roofing.comWe analyzed Richardson-roofing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
richardson-roofing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.1 s
0/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value19.1 s
0/100
10%
Value780 ms
38/100
30%
Value0.189
65/100
15%
Value22.6 s
1/100
10%
1319 ms
522 ms
256 ms
26 ms
432 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Richardson-roofing.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Player.vimeo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Richardson-roofing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (60%)
2.3 MB
931.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Richardson-roofing.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 857.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardson Roofing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 622.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 622.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 618.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardson-roofing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 618.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (71%)
77
22
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardson Roofing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.richardson-roofing.com
1319 ms
bootstrap.css
522 ms
owl.carousel.css
256 ms
aos.css
26 ms
style.min.css
432 ms
style.css
269 ms
style.css
275 ms
style.css
254 ms
style.css
257 ms
style.css
274 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
281 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
338 ms
views-frontend.css
432 ms
animate-animo.css
623 ms
styles.css
370 ms
style.css
673 ms
graphs-lite-public.css
491 ms
page-list.css
492 ms
css
32 ms
style.css
600 ms
widgets.css
526 ms
nextgen_basic_thumbnails.css
528 ms
ngg_basic_slideshow.css
543 ms
smartslider.min.css
610 ms
toolset-common-es-frontend.js
634 ms
jquery.min.js
805 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
683 ms
easy-testimonials-reveal.js
695 ms
easy-columns.css
710 ms
n2-j.min.js
808 ms
nextend-gsap.min.js
840 ms
nextend-frontend.min.js
850 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
869 ms
smartslider-simple-type-frontend.min.js
797 ms
player.js
34 ms
custom_js.js
803 ms
bootstrap.js
899 ms
owl.carousel.js
901 ms
aos.js
14 ms
animo.min.js
844 ms
Chart.min.js
58 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
772 ms
viewportchecker.js
786 ms
edsanimate.js
788 ms
edsanimate.site.js
822 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
772 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
787 ms
index.js
792 ms
graphs-lite-public.js
792 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
736 ms
navigation.js
749 ms
global.js
738 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
698 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
663 ms
wp-embed.min.js
670 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
667 ms
fontface.css
582 ms
icofont.css
675 ms
287426708
181 ms
rr-logo.png
97 ms
icon1.png
97 ms
icon2.png
97 ms
icon3.png
97 ms
facades.png
177 ms
flat-roof.png
98 ms
heritage-icon.png
198 ms
international.png
198 ms
Richadson-Facades-1-HDR-MAIN-PIC.jpg
267 ms
top_line.png
181 ms
Morley-House-15-MAIN-PIC.jpg
198 ms
vb1788792_DS0007_7664-MAIN-PIC.jpg
198 ms
thumb-2.jpg
354 ms
thumb-1.jpg
279 ms
blackbrdr.png
247 ms
banner2_02.jpg
254 ms
arrow_03.png
256 ms
arrow_icon.png
328 ms
Century%20Gothic.woff
338 ms
icofont.ttf
532 ms
bkgrd.png
202 ms
richardson-roofing.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
richardson-roofing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
richardson-roofing.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardson-roofing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardson-roofing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richardson-roofing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richardson Roofing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: