7 sec in total
1.8 sec
4.8 sec
410 ms
Welcome to richlight.de homepage info - get ready to check Richlight best content right away, or after learning these important things about richlight.de
Lampen, Leuchten und andere Leuchtmittel
Visit richlight.deWe analyzed Richlight.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
richlight.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.6 s
0/100
10%
Value18.2 s
0/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value17.4 s
4/100
10%
1765 ms
131 ms
284 ms
190 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Richlight.de, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Richlight.de.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (35%)
3.8 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Richlight.de main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 39.6 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.5 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 147.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richlight images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 822.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 822.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 285.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richlight.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 285.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (48%)
92
48
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richlight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.richlight.de
1765 ms
styles.css3.php
131 ms
bootstrap.css
284 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
190 ms
widgets.css
192 ms
custommenu.css
193 ms
jquery-ui.css
194 ms
ma.upsellslider.css
224 ms
ma.banner7.css
294 ms
ma.onsaleslider.css
297 ms
ma.tabsproduct.css
298 ms
prototype.js
489 ms
ccard.js
317 ms
validation.js
375 ms
builder.js
376 ms
effects.js
382 ms
dragdrop.js
382 ms
controls.js
412 ms
slider.js
469 ms
js.js
470 ms
form.js
477 ms
menu.js
476 ms
translate.js
521 ms
cookies.js
561 ms
ma.jq.slide.js
699 ms
ma.flexslider.js
571 ms
bootstrap.min.js
572 ms
jquery-ui.js
822 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.js
599 ms
ma.mobilemenu.js
654 ms
ma.menu.effect.js
666 ms
backtotop.js
667 ms
custommenu.js
694 ms
ma.nivo.js
747 ms
styles_orange.css
867 ms
ga.js
85 ms
logo.gif
130 ms
my_account_orange.png
99 ms
wishlist_orange.png
97 ms
shopping_cart_orange.png
195 ms
checkout_orange.png
101 ms
login_orange.png
98 ms
topcart_orange.png
195 ms
arrow-up1.png
195 ms
search_orange.png
196 ms
1.jpg
840 ms
2.jpg
1134 ms
Bedroom_6.jpg
769 ms
vier.jpg
801 ms
banner-static1.jpg
463 ms
banner-static2.jpg
567 ms
banner-static3.jpg
742 ms
80-72_44.jpg
663 ms
setsize475475-3046026.jpg
757 ms
img_4504_1.jpg
834 ms
jpg_71.jpg
853 ms
img_7569_1.jpg
858 ms
3029274.jpg
889 ms
jpg_55_5.jpg
925 ms
jpg_44_3.jpg
927 ms
jpg_125.jpg
947 ms
jpg_108.jpg
955 ms
jpg_119_1.jpg
982 ms
jpg_40_4.jpg
1017 ms
sfeer_molfetta_barletta_5.jpg
1019 ms
sfeer_mezzo_krijt_1.jpg
1040 ms
sfeer_molfetta_barletta_3.jpg
1050 ms
sfeer_molfetta_barletta_2.jpg
1075 ms
sfeer_mezzo_krijt_6.jpg
1107 ms
sfeer_molfetta_barletta_6.jpg
1109 ms
jpg_57_4.jpg
1132 ms
jpg_67_1.jpg
1123 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
Oxygen-Bold.woff
1097 ms
BenchNine-Bold.woff
1212 ms
jpg_65_1.jpg
1121 ms
loader.gif
1133 ms
cart_icon_orange.png
1050 ms
wishlist_icon_orange.png
1062 ms
compare_icon_orange.png
1081 ms
new.png
1125 ms
i_msg-note.gif
1142 ms
phone.png
875 ms
mail.png
784 ms
bg_li.png
705 ms
wireless_orange.png
656 ms
in_orange.png
643 ms
v_orange.png
650 ms
twitter_orange.png
631 ms
facebook_orange.png
609 ms
backtop.png
624 ms
print.css
98 ms
arrows.png
95 ms
richlight.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
richlight.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
richlight.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richlight.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richlight.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richlight.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richlight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: