25.9 sec in total
238 ms
24.5 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to richmondmedia.com homepage info - get ready to check RIchmond Media best content right away, or after learning these important things about richmondmedia.com
Custom web site design in Virginia, featuring mobile friendly WordPress, e-commerce, site rebuilds and social media.
Visit richmondmedia.comWe analyzed Richmondmedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 238 ms and then it took 25.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
richmondmedia.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.208
60/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
238 ms
706 ms
262 ms
495 ms
450 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Richmondmedia.com, 36% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Richmondmedia.com.
Page size can be reduced by 97.8 kB (11%)
902.6 kB
804.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Richmondmedia.com main page is 902.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 568.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 743 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RIchmond Media images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richmondmedia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.0 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (70%)
37
11
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RIchmond Media. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richmondmedia.com
238 ms
richmondmedia.com
706 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
262 ms
style.min.css
495 ms
mappress.css
450 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
448 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
445 ms
font-awesome.css
309 ms
social_widget.css
416 ms
dashicons.min.css
650 ms
style.css
876 ms
css
310 ms
masterslider.main.css
544 ms
custom.css
550 ms
jetpack.css
637 ms
colorbox.min.css
583 ms
jquery.min.js
837 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
679 ms
js
319 ms
et-core-unified-16631795595582.min.css
20416 ms
scroll-back-to-top.js
721 ms
custom.min.js
1167 ms
common.js
822 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
844 ms
maxmegamenu.js
1165 ms
jquery.colorbox.1.5.9-min.js
1166 ms
e-202238.js
288 ms
leaflet.css
141 ms
Logo-v12-header.png
972 ms
pagebox1a.png
1024 ms
pagebox4.png
1313 ms
pagebox3b.jpg
1224 ms
02.png
1147 ms
analytics.js
173 ms
js
485 ms
collect
203 ms
white-keys.jpg
901 ms
Box5a.jpg
1172 ms
modules.ttf
714 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
168 ms
et-core-unified-16640391006784.min.css
162 ms
Liquid1c.png
268 ms
Liquid1c.png
842 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
321 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
158 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
280 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf
159 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf
161 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
300 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
263 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
251 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
288 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf
287 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdr.ttf
291 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
291 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf
290 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf
288 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf
292 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
291 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
301 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
314 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
300 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
320 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
300 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
300 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
321 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
314 ms
richmondmedia.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
richmondmedia.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
richmondmedia.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richmondmedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richmondmedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richmondmedia.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RIchmond Media. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: