Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 41

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

richping.com

How to Transfer Domain Names from GoDaddy to NameSilo - Step by Step Videos Tutorial - YouTube

Page Load Speed

13.5 sec in total

First Response

634 ms

Resources Loaded

12.1 sec

Page Rendered

803 ms

richping.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to richping.com homepage info - get ready to check Richping best content right away, or after learning these important things about richping.com

NameSilo deals/coupon code "PINGRICH" to get $1.00 off! Hope it helps! Thanks for watching!Please Subscribe:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMwEuDDteOhoL8Ys...

Visit richping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Richping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 634 ms and then it took 12.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richping.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value37.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

richping.com

634 ms

www.richping.com

415 ms

module_v_2.css

1179 ms

styles_v_1.css

1261 ms

jquery-1.8.2.min.js

1427 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Richping.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com and 2% (1 request) were made to 071245.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Richping.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 554.3 kB (15%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Richping.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 33.2 kB

  • Original 39.7 kB
  • After minification 27.7 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.0 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 521.1 kB

  • Original 3.8 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Richping needs image optimization as it can save up to 521.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (22%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

richping.com accessibility score

41

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

SEO Factors

richping.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Chinese language. Our system also found out that Richping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: