Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

rickenbackerinlandport.com

Rickenbacker International Airport (LCK) | Cargo, Freight, Transportation & Logistics

Page Load Speed

848 ms in total

First Response

80 ms

Resources Loaded

578 ms

Page Rendered

190 ms

rickenbackerinlandport.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rickenbackerinlandport.com now to see the best up-to-date Rickenbacker Inlandport content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rickenbackerinlandport.com

As one of the world’s few cargo-dedicated airports, Rickenbacker International Airport can get goods anywhere in the world consistently and reliably.

Visit rickenbackerinlandport.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rickenbackerinlandport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 768 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rickenbackerinlandport.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

80 ms

rickenbacker.css

62 ms

jquery.js

109 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.8.custom.min.js

67 ms

dynamItScript.js

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Rickenbackerinlandport.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (134 ms) belongs to the original domain Rickenbackerinlandport.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 396.1 kB (48%)

Content Size

820.3 kB

After Optimization

424.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Rickenbackerinlandport.com main page is 820.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 501.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 36.5 kB

  • Original 52.4 kB
  • After minification 51.5 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 18.5 kB

  • Original 241.7 kB
  • After minification 223.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rickenbacker Inlandport images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 320.3 kB

  • Original 501.6 kB
  • After minification 491.3 kB
  • After compression 181.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 320.3 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 20.7 kB

  • Original 24.5 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rickenbackerinlandport.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (38%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rickenbacker Inlandport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

rickenbackerinlandport.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rickenbackerinlandport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rickenbackerinlandport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rickenbacker Inlandport. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: