Tools & Wizards About Us
ridgelinevet.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

ridgelinevet.com

Ridgeline Veterinary Services | Small Animal Veterinary Care in Spencer, Indiana

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

304 ms

ridgelinevet.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ridgelinevet.com now to see the best up-to-date Ridgeline Vet content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ridgelinevet.com

Ridgeline Veterinary Services is a small animal veterinary practice serving Spencer, Bloomington, and surrounding areas.

Visit ridgelinevet.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ridgelinevet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ridgelinevet.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.079

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ridgelinevet.com

12 ms

ridgelinevet.com

143 ms

css

40 ms

style.min.css

234 ms

simple-banner.css

242 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Ridgelinevet.com, 82% (42 requests) were made to 0h577f.p3cdn1.secureserver.net and 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (589 ms) relates to the external source 0h577f.p3cdn1.secureserver.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 187.4 kB (6%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ridgelinevet.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 59.5 kB

  • Original 74.2 kB
  • After minification 71.2 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 126.9 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ridgeline Vet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 298 B

  • Original 347.6 kB
  • After minification 347.6 kB
  • After compression 347.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 670 B

  • Original 78.2 kB
  • After minification 77.8 kB
  • After compression 77.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridgelinevet.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (64%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridgeline Vet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ridgelinevet.com

ridgelinevet.com

12 ms

ridgelinevet.com

ridgelinevet.com

143 ms

css

css

40 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

234 ms

simple-banner.css

simple-banner.css

242 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

381 ms

latest.css

latest.css

497 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

249 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

169 ms

owl-carousel.min.css

owl-carousel.min.css

193 ms

grid-extended.min.css

grid-extended.min.css

207 ms

themeblvd.min.css

themeblvd.min.css

220 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

237 ms

base.min.css

base.min.css

325 ms

style.css

style.css

254 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

323 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

357 ms

simple-banner.js

simple-banner.js

269 ms

coblocks-animation.js

coblocks-animation.js

287 ms

tiny-swiper.js

tiny-swiper.js

305 ms

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

318 ms

themeblvd-fontawesome.min.js

themeblvd-fontawesome.min.js

336 ms

flexslider.min.js

flexslider.min.js

588 ms

owl-carousel.min.js

owl-carousel.min.js

589 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

351 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

363 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

436 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

380 ms

easypiechart.min.js

easypiechart.min.js

459 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

391 ms

themeblvd.min.js

themeblvd.min.js

404 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

7 ms

tti.min.js

tti.min.js

5 ms

ridgeline-newlogo-1.png

ridgeline-newlogo-1.png

155 ms

paper_light.png

paper_light.png

302 ms

slider-front-1400x525.png

slider-front-1400x525.png

57 ms

slider-puppy-1400x525.png

slider-puppy-1400x525.png

237 ms

Front-of-building-cropped-1-300x200.png

Front-of-building-cropped-1-300x200.png

184 ms

Ridgeline_Veterinary029-scaled-e1640885672105-800x800.jpg

Ridgeline_Veterinary029-scaled-e1640885672105-800x800.jpg

183 ms

Ridgeline_Veterinary054-scaled-e1640886230729-800x800.jpg

Ridgeline_Veterinary054-scaled-e1640886230729-800x800.jpg

193 ms

Untitled-design-800x800.png

Untitled-design-800x800.png

260 ms

Ridgeline_Veterinary050-scaled-e1640885934337-800x800.jpg

Ridgeline_Veterinary050-scaled-e1640885934337-800x800.jpg

291 ms

ridgeline-newlogo-1-300x162.png

ridgeline-newlogo-1-300x162.png

263 ms

close.svg

close.svg

202 ms

search.svg

search.svg

314 ms

chev-up.svg

chev-up.svg

327 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

98 ms

-W_gXIrsVjjeyEnPC45qD2NoFPtBE0xCh2AOrR8K.ttf

-W_gXIrsVjjeyEnPC45qD2NoFPtBE0xCh2AOrR8K.ttf

125 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

127 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

137 ms

side-nav-list-outer-000000.png

side-nav-list-outer-000000.png

200 ms

Accessibility Review

ridgelinevet.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ridgelinevet.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ridgelinevet.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridgelinevet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ridgelinevet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ridgelinevet.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ridgeline Vet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: