15.6 sec in total
682 ms
13.7 sec
1.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Risktal content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about risktal.com
Risktal, who provides a professional service to handle organizational risk plan, also help to manage the consultancies using technology and digital solutions.
Visit risktal.comWe analyzed Risktal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 682 ms and then it took 14.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
risktal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value18.3 s
0/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.191
64/100
15%
Value15.9 s
6/100
10%
682 ms
5931 ms
645 ms
658 ms
667 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Risktal.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Risktal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 319.5 kB (17%)
1.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Risktal.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.8 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 154.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Risktal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 70.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.0 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Risktal.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (46%)
71
38
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Risktal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
risktal.com
682 ms
www.risktal.com
5931 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
645 ms
style.min.css
658 ms
styles.css
667 ms
easy-wp-pagenavigation.css
670 ms
jquery.min.js
887 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
755 ms
modernizr.min.js
88 ms
bootstrap.min.css
88 ms
css
88 ms
style.css
1087 ms
responsive.css
965 ms
resp1.css
960 ms
animate.css
988 ms
jquery.min.js
79 ms
bootstrap.min.js
81 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
533 ms
wow.js
1062 ms
jquery.liMarquee.js
1064 ms
hammer.min.js
1063 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
1064 ms
script.js
1065 ms
service-page-script.js
1077 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1076 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1077 ms
index.js
1075 ms
api.js
49 ms
index.js
1075 ms
forms.js
1075 ms
analytics.js
339 ms
TwaDQ88C_normal.jpg
422 ms
2.gif
1270 ms
logo.png
502 ms
sprite.png
1024 ms
banner1.jpg
1219 ms
banner2.jpg
1024 ms
banner3.jpg
1220 ms
home-banner1.png
1906 ms
service-grwth-chart.jpg
1233 ms
growth-shadepoint.png
1227 ms
home-banner2.png
1244 ms
home-banner3.jpg
1472 ms
map1.png
1490 ms
map2.png
1489 ms
map3.png
1489 ms
map4.png
1488 ms
loader-risktalnew.gif
1497 ms
Crypto-08.04.22-300x330.png
1691 ms
Blockchain-300x330.png
1906 ms
Board-Effectiveness-300x330.png
1687 ms
Manage-Your-Risk1-300x330.png
1909 ms
Slide7-300x330.png
1941 ms
blog2.jpg
1898 ms
blog3.jpg
1907 ms
video.png
2128 ms
gothic-regular.woff
1923 ms
gothic-bold.woff
2133 ms
watermark.png
1920 ms
twitter-icon-blk.png
1919 ms
widgets.js
129 ms
collect
48 ms
183792775
697 ms
recaptcha__en.js
477 ms
widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html
273 ms
design.png
1328 ms
593099444-faf315ed6475bdd305f3ff80c5648fa730480adbd894a8aa22e8c27e51896cec-d.jpg
703 ms
player.js
251 ms
player.css
228 ms
vuid.min.js
225 ms
settings
463 ms
593099444-faf315ed6475bdd305f3ff80c5648fa730480adbd894a8aa22e8c27e51896cec-d
114 ms
button.d2f864f87f544dc0c11d7d712a191c1f.js
23 ms
embeds
53 ms
follow_button.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.en.html
42 ms
risktal.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
risktal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
risktal.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Risktal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Risktal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
risktal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Risktal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: