3.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.4 sec
242 ms
Visit ritba.org now to see the best up-to-date Ritba content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ritba.org
Visit ritba.orgWe analyzed Ritba.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
ritba.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value15.3 s
0/100
10%
Value22.6 s
0/100
25%
Value18.8 s
0/100
10%
Value690 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.132
81/100
15%
Value27.3 s
0/100
10%
1062 ms
121 ms
139 ms
140 ms
142 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Ritba.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Americaswaterwaywatch.uscg.mil. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ritba.org.
Page size can be reduced by 466.8 kB (30%)
1.6 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Ritba.org main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ritba images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 251.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 251.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritba.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (59%)
70
29
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritba. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ritba.org
1062 ms
system.base.css
121 ms
system.menus.css
139 ms
system.messages.css
140 ms
system.theme.css
142 ms
jquery.qtip.css
144 ms
qtip.css
156 ms
calendar_multiday.css
181 ms
comment.css
204 ms
date.css
207 ms
datepicker.1.7.css
208 ms
field.css
210 ms
node.css
229 ms
search.css
240 ms
twitter_block.css
270 ms
user.css
272 ms
views.css
275 ms
ctools.css
276 ms
superfish.css
304 ms
superfish-vertical.css
299 ms
superfish-navbar.css
335 ms
views_slideshow.css
342 ms
views_slideshow_cycle.css
340 ms
default.css
343 ms
reset.css
362 ms
style.css
385 ms
jquery.js
468 ms
jquery.once.js
415 ms
drupal.js
416 ms
jquery.qtip.js
426 ms
qtip.js
422 ms
weather_es.js
462 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
485 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
484 ms
superfish.js
487 ms
supersubs.js
494 ms
supposition.js
539 ms
sftouchscreen.js
423 ms
views_slideshow.js
420 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
429 ms
views_slideshow_cycle.js
432 ms
googleanalytics.js
426 ms
javascript.js
455 ms
ga.js
8 ms
__utm.gif
80 ms
block_1_image.jpg
154 ms
Report.gif
731 ms
ConsUpdatesBlock.jpg
220 ms
block_3_image.jpg
193 ms
Warning.jpg
192 ms
green.jpg
256 ms
drnowtxtlater.jpg
367 ms
questionmark.png
166 ms
arrow.png
243 ms
facebook_logo.png
261 ms
twitter_0.png
263 ms
header_bottom.png
68 ms
logo_Ritba_0.jpg
80 ms
icon_search.jpg
68 ms
bg_nav.png
79 ms
newport_prudence_island-boats_narragansett_bay_1.jpg
221 ms
horseneck_beach_atlantic-moonset_over_narragansett.jpg
193 ms
dartmouth_newport_cape-newport_bridge_toll.jpg
264 ms
newport_cape_cod-boats_narragansett_bay_.jpg
268 ms
bg_pre_content.png
339 ms
horizontal_dash.png
154 ms
arrow.png
230 ms
ezpass.png
262 ms
logo_white.png
279 ms
shadow.png
306 ms
unsupportedbrowser
82 ms
ritba.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ritba.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ritba.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritba.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritba.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ritba.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritba. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: