2.2 sec in total
86 ms
1.8 sec
248 ms
Welcome to riverbankconservation.com homepage info - get ready to check River Bank Conservation best content right away, or after learning these important things about riverbankconservation.com
RiverBank establishes and manages mitigation banks (Clean Water Act) and conservation banks (Endangered Species Act) to provide offsets for developments.
Visit riverbankconservation.comWe analyzed Riverbankconservation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
riverbankconservation.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value8.5 s
18/100
10%
Value800 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
86 ms
1031 ms
114 ms
11 ms
20 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Riverbankconservation.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Riverbankconservation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 159.4 kB (13%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Riverbankconservation.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 690.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. River Bank Conservation images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 24.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riverbankconservation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (75%)
63
16
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of River Bank Conservation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
riverbankconservation.com
86 ms
www.riverbankconservation.com
1031 ms
jde3viv.js
114 ms
font-awesome.min.css
11 ms
hover.css
20 ms
animate-custom.css
26 ms
style.css
19 ms
custom.css
19 ms
style.min.css
18 ms
jquery.min.js
24 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
23 ms
modernizr.min.js
23 ms
jquery.cookie.js
23 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
22 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
35 ms
jquery.scrollme.min.js
26 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
26 ms
jquery.selectBox.js
25 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
27 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
28 ms
jquery.localScroll.min.js
27 ms
waypoints.min.js
28 ms
masonry.pkgd.js
28 ms
jquery.tablesorter.min.js
36 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
29 ms
jquery.cycle2.carousel.js
29 ms
jquery.cycle2.swipe.js
30 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
30 ms
jquery.mmenu.min.js
31 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
35 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
31 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
32 ms
poplight.js
33 ms
external-tracking.min.js
36 ms
api.js
44 ms
utils.js
33 ms
alertbar-close.js
34 ms
sticky-header.js
34 ms
media-fancybox.js
36 ms
base.css
21 ms
layout.css
12 ms
forms.css
28 ms
components.css
38 ms
elements.css
35 ms
partials.css
15 ms
wordpress.css
40 ms
vendors.css
42 ms
analytics.js
184 ms
gtm.js
183 ms
recaptcha__en.js
249 ms
site_logo_2.png
46 ms
home_hero_1-mlwh88q57xkvfexb4w473hymhvmzjo4awbsvh3oa2o.jpg
171 ms
what-we-do-main-1200x398-mma9u3i8l30k56cd0oyj831if1ysxlyq7hsuik00sg.jpg
222 ms
Tomahawk-e1455290028296-1260x600.jpg
87 ms
RBC-Map3Green.jpg
46 ms
adam-riggsbee-275x325.jpg
45 ms
robert-shepherd-275x325.jpg
171 ms
annie-mcdaniel-275x325.jpg
89 ms
footer_logo.png
170 ms
sitebytgk.png
171 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
178 ms
d
128 ms
d
133 ms
d
256 ms
d
260 ms
d
133 ms
d
157 ms
d
157 ms
d
157 ms
d
256 ms
collect
158 ms
collect
173 ms
collect
137 ms
js
63 ms
p.gif
83 ms
riverbankconservation.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
riverbankconservation.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
riverbankconservation.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riverbankconservation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riverbankconservation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
riverbankconservation.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of River Bank Conservation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: