8.1 sec in total
56 ms
6.2 sec
1.9 sec
Visit rocxial.com now to see the best up-to-date Rocxial content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rocxial.com
If you're looking for a Hair Transplant in Dubai & Abu Dhabi, look no further. The Dynamic Clinic in Dubai is the most effective and dependable treatment center.
Visit rocxial.comWe analyzed Rocxial.com page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 8.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
rocxial.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value8.5 s
1/100
25%
Value16.4 s
0/100
10%
Value27,420 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.07
96/100
15%
Value38.6 s
0/100
10%
56 ms
1233 ms
28 ms
62 ms
60 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rocxial.com, 78% (76 requests) were made to Dynamiclinic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Js.zohocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Dynamiclinic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 358.6 kB (27%)
1.3 MB
977.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Rocxial.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 776.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 351.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 351.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rocxial images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 290 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rocxial.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (33%)
91
61
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rocxial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rocxial.com
56 ms
1233 ms
fngzk.css
28 ms
fngzk.js
62 ms
analytics.js
60 ms
fngzk.css
85 ms
fngzk.css
105 ms
fngzk.css
133 ms
fngzk.js
107 ms
collect
50 ms
gtm.js
45 ms
collect
116 ms
cosmetic_surgery.jpg
136 ms
cosmetic_injectables.jpg
134 ms
hair_transplant.jpg
79 ms
laser_treatment.jpg
79 ms
skin_care.jpg
81 ms
weight_loss.jpg
83 ms
sub-header.jpg
81 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1453 ms
bootstrap.min.js
16 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
13 ms
owl.navigation.js
32 ms
custom.js
26 ms
jquery.ihotspot.min.js
14 ms
stickThis.js
19 ms
frontend.min.js
29 ms
ubermenu.min.js
27 ms
jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js
31 ms
js.cookie.min.js
41 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
580 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
43 ms
front.min.js
46 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
38 ms
lazyload.min.js
46 ms
ez-toc-icomoon.ttf
789 ms
email-decode.min.js
41 ms
widget
903 ms
youtube.png
775 ms
hqdefault.jpg
590 ms
bell3.png
252 ms
whatsapp-icon1.png
258 ms
royal-logo-new.png
251 ms
telephone.svg
253 ms
smartphone.svg
484 ms
whatsapp-round-line.svg
478 ms
Best-Hair-Transplant-in-Dubai-Clinic.jpg
780 ms
Best-Hair-Transplant-in-Dubai.jpeg
795 ms
Hair-Transplant-Cost-in-Dubai.jpeg
1220 ms
Hair-Transplant-in-Dubai.jpg
1018 ms
ht_1-removebg-preview.png
1122 ms
ht2-removebg-preview.png
1325 ms
ht3-removebg-preview.png
1554 ms
Best-Hair-Transplant-Clinic-in-Dubai-Abu-Dhabi-min-300x220.jpg
1608 ms
Dr.-Abdul-Majeed-Makkiya-Specialist-Plastic-Surgeon-Dubai-New-e1618914722969.jpg
1123 ms
line.jpg
1219 ms
Dr.-Dina-Elyamani.jpg
1217 ms
Dr-Sannia.jpg
1221 ms
mayee.png
1219 ms
stars-rating.png
1223 ms
google-logo-e1622622522615.png
1221 ms
immi.png
1222 ms
unnamed.png
1223 ms
Untitled-2a-300x89.png
1225 ms
Untitled-2.png
1225 ms
imgpsh_fullsize_animgrft.png
1607 ms
Hair-Fillers-How-Does-it-Work-in-Dubai-Cost.jpg
2345 ms
Hair-Transplant-Prices-Dubai.jpg
2231 ms
travelling-after-hair-transplant.jpg
2343 ms
fb-cover.jpg
2392 ms
enfield-royal-favicon.png
1374 ms
placeholder.png
1376 ms
godaddy-ssl.png
1373 ms
call-back.png
1395 ms
fda-approved-logo.jpg
1394 ms
accredition.jpg
1873 ms
google-logo-e1622622522615.png
1179 ms
20-years-experience.jpg
1180 ms
stars-rating.png
1195 ms
308510126_164334769525045_8978127418127191414_nthumb.jpg
1027 ms
308818811_481925103811912_312088320545809238_nthumb.jpg
1040 ms
website
118 ms
308800878_489780499667880_5199596334972635985_nthumb.jpg
955 ms
308043392_604661974461278_992545327155194808_nthumb.jpg
956 ms
floatbutton1_764bf172fd710d0d540b777a5a05ab02_.css
234 ms
floatbutton1_c23114c570895bdda09c4b7af500fa49_.js
231 ms
public
362 ms
308818811_481925103811912_312088320545809238_n.jpg
2373 ms
308800878_489780499667880_5199596334972635985_n.jpg
1834 ms
308043392_604661974461278_992545327155194808_n.jpg
2316 ms
floatbuttonpostload_f1220b7c9b22ce1312e9acd2dd6c3f30_.css
244 ms
newembedtheme_ac831ffd8a13244c387f8c39805eb846_.css
539 ms
Sep_19_2022_wmsliteapi.js
421 ms
siqnewchatwindow_25f8de082bb85aa96c3fb41ce20b81d0_.js
692 ms
resource_b226e546dff101783c7bae3bf7600dc6_.js
585 ms
fetchvisitorconfigurations.ls
223 ms
logdebuginfo.ls
234 ms
rocxial.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rocxial.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rocxial.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rocxial.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rocxial.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rocxial.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rocxial. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: