Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

roopabhangy.com

Wooden Doors and Windows Kochi,Kerala: Leading manufacturer in wooden doors and windows Ernakulam,Kerala

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

296 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

476 ms

roopabhangy.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Roopabhangy content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about roopabhangy.com

roopabhangy doors the leading manufactures of Wooden Doors, Window frames and shutters out of well seasonal hard wood in central Kerala

Visit roopabhangy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Roopabhangy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 296 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roopabhangy.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,040 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.4 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roopabhangy.com

296 ms

css

26 ms

style.css

87 ms

js

64 ms

sdk.js

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Roopabhangy.com, 45% (42 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (978 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 450.4 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Roopabhangy.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 90.6 kB

  • Original 99.0 kB
  • After minification 38.1 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 60.9 kB, which is 62% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.6 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 35.7 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roopabhangy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 415.7 kB
  • After minification 415.7 kB
  • After compression 408.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 316.3 kB

  • Original 541.8 kB
  • After minification 541.1 kB
  • After compression 225.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roopabhangy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 316.3 kB or 58% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (23%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roopabhangy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

roopabhangy.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

roopabhangy.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

roopabhangy.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roopabhangy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roopabhangy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Roopabhangy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: