2.7 sec in total
64 ms
845 ms
1.8 sec
Click here to check amazing Rpoedge content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rpoedge.com
ACCELERATE YOUR TALENT ACQUSITION WITH RPOEDGE From On-Demand Recruiters to End-to-End RPO Solutions Pay for your next talent hunt, only when you need it. CONTACT US ACCELERATE Your Talent Acquisition...
Visit rpoedge.comWe analyzed Rpoedge.com page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
rpoedge.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value3.2 s
72/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value1,590 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value14.8 s
8/100
10%
64 ms
28 ms
40 ms
38 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Rpoedge.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (386 ms) belongs to the original domain Rpoedge.com.
Page size can be reduced by 424.6 kB (11%)
4.0 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rpoedge.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 182.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 182.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 238.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rpoedge images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpoedge.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (51%)
84
41
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rpoedge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rpoedge.com
64 ms
styles.css
28 ms
style.min.css
40 ms
theme.min.css
38 ms
custom-frontend-legacy.min.css
44 ms
custom-frontend.min.css
59 ms
post-10.css
45 ms
swiper.min.css
103 ms
custom-pro-frontend.min.css
79 ms
post-11.css
46 ms
post-2887.css
55 ms
post-2831.css
69 ms
style.css
53 ms
css
74 ms
jquery.min.js
112 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
98 ms
post-3179.css
65 ms
post-4422.css
66 ms
post-4430.css
66 ms
animations.min.css
94 ms
index.js
68 ms
index.js
92 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
101 ms
api.js
66 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
100 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
102 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
270 ms
index.js
101 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
102 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
382 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
383 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
384 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
386 ms
hooks.min.js
379 ms
i18n.min.js
379 ms
frontend.min.js
383 ms
waypoints.min.js
380 ms
core.min.js
380 ms
swiper.min.js
384 ms
share-link.min.js
371 ms
dialog.min.js
361 ms
frontend.min.js
361 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
357 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
354 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
348 ms
cropped-header-logo-1.png
157 ms
specialized-rpo-300x200-1.jpg
157 ms
quailty01-1.jpg
159 ms
header-logo.png
156 ms
banner-background.jpg
157 ms
about-background.png
159 ms
about-left.png
210 ms
about01.png
159 ms
about02.png
160 ms
about03.png
157 ms
work-background.jpg
208 ms
arrow01.png
160 ms
work-count.png
206 ms
work01.png
159 ms
arrow02.png
204 ms
work02.png
205 ms
work03.png
204 ms
arrow03.png
205 ms
work04.png
204 ms
font
153 ms
quailty-background.jpg
213 ms
quailty01.jpg
103 ms
Untitled-10-1024x511.jpg
99 ms
quailty02.jpg
96 ms
test-background.jpg
102 ms
advantage01.png
94 ms
advantage02.png
95 ms
advantage03.png
102 ms
advantage04.png
101 ms
advantage05.png
95 ms
advantage06.png
96 ms
advantage07.png
100 ms
advantage08.png
100 ms
entrepreneur-businessman-showing-company-strategy-using-tablet-corporate-presentation-300x200.jpg
190 ms
blog-3-300x200.jpg
100 ms
blog-1-300x200.jpg
98 ms
recaptcha__en.js
85 ms
font
55 ms
footer-background.jpg
158 ms
header-logo-1.png
156 ms
rpoedge.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rpoedge.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rpoedge.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpoedge.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rpoedge.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rpoedge.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rpoedge. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: