2.3 sec in total
360 ms
1.1 sec
810 ms
Visit rssfeedfinder.com now to see the best up-to-date RSS Feed Finder content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rssfeedfinder.com
The easy way to locate RSS Feeds for SEO, Auto-blogging, Content Curation and more. Fast and Easy Desktop Software works on Mac and PC.
Visit rssfeedfinder.comWe analyzed Rssfeedfinder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 360 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rssfeedfinder.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value1,430 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
360 ms
28 ms
57 ms
87 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Rssfeedfinder.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (509 ms) belongs to the original domain Rssfeedfinder.com.
Page size can be reduced by 825.7 kB (53%)
1.6 MB
736.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Rssfeedfinder.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 624.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RSS Feed Finder needs image optimization as it can save up to 100.2 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 249.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 249.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 448.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rssfeedfinder.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 448.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (46%)
41
22
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RSS Feed Finder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rssfeedfinder.com
360 ms
css
28 ms
base.css
57 ms
elementary-video-sales-page.css
87 ms
thrive_default.css
165 ms
thrive_colors.css
59 ms
thrive_flat.css
141 ms
jquery.js
123 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
85 ms
compat.min.js
88 ms
skip-links.js
113 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
112 ms
style.css
112 ms
thrive_content_builder_frontend.min.js
188 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
117 ms
superfish.min.js
188 ms
superfish.args.min.js
188 ms
wp-embed.min.js
191 ms
ul2_f_green.png
272 ms
flat_sep4.png
272 ms
ul4_f_orange.png
272 ms
ul1_f_green.png
272 ms
rss-feed-finder-box-med.png
382 ms
High-authority-feed-sources3.jpg
271 ms
relevant-keywords.jpg
318 ms
feedscrape-results.jpg
509 ms
daniel-calleja.jpg
350 ms
alan-redmond.jpg
315 ms
blue_s1_f.png
318 ms
ul2_f_orange.png
351 ms
ul1_f_white.png
359 ms
ul7_f_red.png
350 ms
cc_amex.png
361 ms
cc_discover.png
363 ms
cc_mc.png
362 ms
cc_visa.png
368 ms
cc_paypal.png
420 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
22 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
29 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
56 ms
Marketers-Vector-Icons-604.ttf
252 ms
HjbBFaeds1Q
91 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
45 ms
www-embed-player.js
75 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
45 ms
ad_status.js
55 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
42 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
46 ms
rssfeedfinder.com accessibility score
rssfeedfinder.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rssfeedfinder.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rssfeedfinder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rssfeedfinder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rssfeedfinder.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RSS Feed Finder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: