5.3 sec in total
175 ms
4.7 sec
443 ms
Visit rt-2012.com now to see the best up-to-date RT 2012 content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rt-2012.com
40 000 études thermique RT 2012 déjà réalisées en France. Etude RT2012 à partir de 99€ en 7 heures ouvrées. Certifié RGE BENR Etude thermique Réglementaire.
Visit rt-2012.comWe analyzed Rt-2012.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rt-2012.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.038
100/100
15%
Value5.3 s
72/100
10%
175 ms
1069 ms
273 ms
397 ms
478 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Rt-2012.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Avis-verifies.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rt-2012.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (39%)
2.6 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Rt-2012.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RT 2012 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 609.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 609.4 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 351.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rt-2012.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 351.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (61%)
61
24
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RT 2012. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rt-2012.com
175 ms
www.rt-2012.com
1069 ms
2629500094.js
273 ms
autoptimize_acae342df6ad3a6ef3df7215bec4f37b.css
397 ms
dashicons.min.css
478 ms
jquery.js
496 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
574 ms
ga-scroll-events.js
655 ms
front_end_script.js
735 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
815 ms
front.js
1178 ms
modernizr.js
1258 ms
superfish.js
1364 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
1417 ms
easing.js
1497 ms
respond.js
1578 ms
swipe.min.js
1658 ms
nicescroll.js
1739 ms
sticky.js
1763 ms
prettyPhoto.js
1765 ms
flexslider.min.js
1819 ms
isotope.min.js
1847 ms
carouFredSel.min.js
1927 ms
appear.js
1897 ms
orbit.js
1931 ms
init.js
1979 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
2092 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
2013 ms
nectar-slider.js
2061 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2104 ms
nectar-love.js
2141 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2173 ms
jquery.royalslider.min.js
2263 ms
scripts.js
2222 ms
widget3.js
471 ms
conversion.js
39 ms
event
38 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1906 ms
dc.js
139 ms
fbds.js
294 ms
analytics.js
88 ms
keeplanet-logo.png
2138 ms
slider_rt2012.jpg
2541 ms
violet-bg.png
2137 ms
diagonal_line.png
2220 ms
sprite_process.png
2300 ms
benr-rge.jpg
2964 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
2345 ms
collect
6 ms
collect
39 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
2281 ms
OpenSans-ExtraBold-webfont.woff
2202 ms
92 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
2075 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
2259 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1892 ms
girl-money.png
1914 ms
transporteur-panier_paiementv4gimpv4.png
1707 ms
logo_footer_cofrac-1.png
1654 ms
NFS_Avis-en-ligne1.png
1604 ms
logo_150_benr-1.png
1524 ms
numero-vert.png
1473 ms
widget16-1022_jsonp.php
260 ms
widget16-1022.png
92 ms
loading_orange.gif
202 ms
widget_v2.134.js
25 ms
__$$__stringtable_lang_fr.js
14 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
167 ms
21 ms
rt-2012.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
rt-2012.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rt-2012.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rt-2012.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rt-2012.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rt-2012.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RT 2012. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: