3.9 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.4 sec
294 ms
Visit rt2000.net now to see the best up-to-date Rt 2000 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rt2000.net
Rt2000.net is where tens of thousands of advertisers reach and engage valuable and educated audiences, helping facilitate more than half a million buys every year, generating more than six-digit in ea...
Visit rt2000.netWe analyzed Rt2000.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
rt2000.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value2,810 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.106
88/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
1131 ms
29 ms
73 ms
68 ms
57 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Rt2000.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rt2000.net.
Page size can be reduced by 102.4 kB (63%)
163.5 kB
61.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Rt2000.net main page is 163.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 104.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rt 2000 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rt2000.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (82%)
22
4
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rt 2000. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rt2000.net
1131 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
29 ms
style.min.css
73 ms
style.css
68 ms
css
57 ms
font-awesome.min.css
66 ms
news-responsive.css
61 ms
wp-review.css
62 ms
gdpr-main.css
56 ms
news-global.css
88 ms
jquery.min.js
103 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
95 ms
wp-subscribe-form.css
93 ms
news-customscripts.js
84 ms
sticky.js
93 ms
js.cookie.min.js
178 ms
underscore.min.js
179 ms
wp-util.min.js
184 ms
main.js
185 ms
main.js
183 ms
wp-subscribe-form.js
192 ms
RT-2000-Logo.png
142 ms
Social-Media-66x47.jpg
142 ms
Application-66x47.jpg
141 ms
Hardware-66x47.jpg
141 ms
Environment-66x47.jpg
141 ms
Tiger-66x47.jpg
142 ms
Space-Technology-66x47.jpg
141 ms
nothumb-news-widgetthumb.png
80 ms
Marketing-Solution-Ads.jpg
141 ms
canadian-businesses.png
141 ms
SEO-112x80.jpg
141 ms
Social-Media-2-112x80.jpg
140 ms
Web-Design-112x80.jpg
140 ms
Environment-112x80.jpg
141 ms
Social-Media-112x80.jpg
141 ms
Application-112x80.jpg
141 ms
Hardware-112x80.jpg
140 ms
Business-Plan-112x80.jpg
140 ms
nothumb-news-featured.png
78 ms
hearing-patient-112x80.jpeg
140 ms
cute-puppy-112x80.jpeg
139 ms
dog-clinic-3-112x80.jpeg
140 ms
pexels-photo-708440-112x80.jpeg
140 ms
yellow-wall-cat-112x80.jpeg
140 ms
gdpr-logo.png
140 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lP.ttf
100 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lP.ttf
101 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
55 ms
rt2000.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
rt2000.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rt2000.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rt2000.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rt2000.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rt2000.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: