6.5 sec in total
1.4 sec
5 sec
186 ms
Visit rwdb.kr now to see the best up-to-date Rwdb content for South Korea and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rwdb.kr
RWDB Responsive Web Design dB Web awards, 우수 하이브리드웹·반응형웹 모음 사이트
Visit rwdb.krWe analyzed Rwdb.kr page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rwdb.kr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value18.1 s
0/100
25%
Value45.7 s
0/100
10%
Value440 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.168
71/100
15%
Value27.2 s
0/100
10%
1378 ms
387 ms
388 ms
582 ms
409 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Rwdb.kr, 3% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Rwdb.kr.
Page size can be reduced by 944.4 kB (39%)
2.4 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rwdb.kr main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rwdb images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 357.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 357.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 474.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rwdb.kr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 474.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (65%)
77
27
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rwdb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rwdb.kr
1378 ms
fontello.css
387 ms
NotoSansKR-Hestia.css
388 ms
bootstrap.min.css
582 ms
font-awesome.min.css
409 ms
styles.css
476 ms
google-maps-builder.min.css
577 ms
map-icons.css
591 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
593 ms
animate.css
600 ms
owl.carousel.css
671 ms
magnific-popup.css
769 ms
font-awesome.min.css
773 ms
style.css
967 ms
rwdb.kr
1255 ms
font-awesome.min.css
5 ms
style.css
865 ms
style.css
962 ms
style.css
987 ms
jetpack.css
1006 ms
jquery.js
1252 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1156 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1162 ms
js
83 ms
style.css
917 ms
post-like.min.js
958 ms
photon.js
1184 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1188 ms
scripts.js
1186 ms
google-maps-builder.min.js
1188 ms
map-icons.js
1207 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
58 ms
wpgroho.js
1204 ms
masonry.min.js
1296 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
1306 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1307 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1359 ms
e-201611.js
7 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1371 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1272 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
1341 ms
owl.carousel.js
1349 ms
plugins.js
1354 ms
jquery.liMarquee.js
1343 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1270 ms
retina-1.1.0.min.js
1259 ms
scripts.js
1347 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1480 ms
css
25 ms
css
40 ms
banner2-970x90.gif
729 ms
logo1.png
766 ms
0011111.jpg
1272 ms
1603142_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
768 ms
1603141_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1167 ms
160314_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
996 ms
1603072_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1189 ms
1603071_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1271 ms
160307_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
895 ms
1602291_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1092 ms
160229_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1384 ms
1602221_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1289 ms
160222_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1550 ms
1502153_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1385 ms
1502152_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1654 ms
1502151_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1386 ms
1620111_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1395 ms
162011_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1492 ms
160201_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1490 ms
NotoSansKR-Light-Hestia.woff
2207 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
14 ms
NotoSansKR-Thin-Hestia.woff
1892 ms
notokr-regular.woff
1755 ms
NotoSansKR-DemiLight-Hestia.woff
1958 ms
NotoSansKR-Medium-Hestia.woff
1955 ms
NotoSansKR-Bold-Hestia.woff
2091 ms
NotoSansKR-Black-Hestia.woff
1867 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1967 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2084 ms
1602011_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1997 ms
1601261_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
1980 ms
160126_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
2041 ms
160114_thumbnail_RWDB-750x273.jpg
2004 ms
hovercard.css
121 ms
services.css
123 ms
rwdb_logo.svg
1772 ms
g.gif
65 ms
rwdb.kr accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rwdb.kr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rwdb.kr SEO score
KO
KO
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rwdb.kr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Korean is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rwdb.kr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rwdb.kr
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rwdb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: